Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 03/03/25 in all areas

  1. Unfortunately there is still no Scanner support for reading SMART from SAS drives.
    1 point
  2. Drives need to be formatted as NTFS or ReFS to be added to a pool, as DrivePool uses features native to those file systems (e.g. exfat doesn't support alternate data streams, which DrivePool uses to assist with duplication).
    1 point
  3. Is this just kind of flaky, or am I maybe doing something wrong? I have 3 scanner installations on my lan. When I use the drop down in the Connect to I was seeing one of my remote installations, then I installed on another device yesterday, but now I don't see any other installations in the drop down. All devices have the LAN control option checked.
    1 point
  4. Hi mikernet. For whatever it is worth, I am successfully using SyncThing with my primary pool (currently only ~ 16TB before duplication) without any fine-tuning, but the content is reasonably static (e.g. photo albums, family videos, financial records, various documents) and I have DrivePool's Read Striping disabled. Note that SyncThing is not intended for situations where changes are likely to occur faster than the ability to distribute those changes between devices (e.g. if device A renames a file and device B also renames that file before it can receive the update from device A, then SyncThing is going to complain). Diving in... DrivePool FileID Notification bug: as I understand it, this risk involves both excessive notifications (reads being classified as writes) and insufficient notifications (e.g. moves not being reported), to which applications that rely on FileID notifications are vulnerable. The original thread for reference. SyncThing uses two independent mechanisms to detect changes, a scheduled full scan (default hourly) and a watcher that listens for notifications (default enabled); link to documentation. This means SyncThing's scheduled scans will catch any moves that are missed by its watcher, resulting in at most a delay of one hour (or as configured) to update other nodes. I do not know how well its watcher would handle excessive notifications if those occur, but it can be easily disabled if the load becomes a problem. DrivePool FileID Generation bug: as I understand it, this risk involves DrivePool's use of an incrementing-from-zero counter that resets on reboot, resulting in data corruption/loss for any application (local or remote) that relies on FileID having cross-boot permanence for identifying files (q.v. above original thread link). As far as I have determined SyncThing should not be affected by this bug so long as its watcher is not being used to monitor pool content via a remote share (e.g. if for some strange esoteric reason you mapped a share "\\pc\pool" to a drive "X:" and then told SyncThing to add "X:\stufftosync" as a folder instead of following the instruction to only add local folders). I'm... actually not sure if the watcher can even do that, but if so that's the only risk. DrivePool Read Striping bug: as I understand, this risk involves DrivePool sometimes returning invalid hashes or even invalid content to certain applications when this feature is enabled to read a duplicated file via concurrent access to the drives that file is stored on. Some systems apparently do not experience this bug despite using the same application as others. The original thread for reference. I have NOT tested striping with SyncThing, as I keep DrivePool's Read Striping pre-emptively disabled rather than have to exhaustively test all the apps I use (and given the possibility that the problem could involve some kind of race condition, which are a PITA to avoid false negatives on, I am happy to continue erring on the side of safety over performance).
    1 point
  5. Shane

    Best way to cut and paste?

    If you're not doing anything complicated with your pool, that should be it. Manage Pool -> Re-measure and if you're using duplication Cog Icon -> Troubleshooting -> Recheck duplication if it doesn't do it automatically (if you've got duplication turned on for the whole pool then at the end you should see the big pie chart in the GUI showing no unduplicated data). You can also inspect/alter the duplication levels of folders and subfolders manually via the table provided by Manage Pool -> File Protection -> Folder duplication if you only want duplication for parts of the pool.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...