-
Posts
11662 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
380
Christopher (Drashna) last won the day on January 5
Christopher (Drashna) had the most liked content!
About Christopher (Drashna)

- Birthday 06/25/1983
Contact Methods
-
MSN
drashna@live.com
-
Website URL
https://drashna.net/blog/
-
Jabber
christopher@covecube.com
-
Skype
drashnajaelre
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Christopher (Drashna)'s Achievements
-
That really depends on the size of files you typically add, and how much data you may dump at once. In general, the 2x 512Gb drives should be more than plenty for most anything you'd throw at it. Though, if you wanted to use file placement rules to keep data on there, it still depends ... My personal opinion? 512Gb for the cache, and 1TB drives for the gaming PC.
-
Honestly, the low reliability was due to the floods, and then one specific line of drive (ST#000DM001) that was the issue. Aside from those, Seagate drives have been rock solid for me (and IIRC, BackBlaze statistics bears that out too). That said, I do use a mix of brands. As for the drives, that sucks. And if they were from the same batch of drives, that definitely makes sense (unfortunately). But for any drive really, it's not "if" it fails, but "when". And maybe ... how catastrophically. As for the dropout, if that is USB, then it's USB. That's normal (and IIRC, allowed by the specs for USB). Unfortunately. And yeah, I hear you on the drives. It's the only reason I don't have duplication for most of my pool. Only the critical stuff is duplicated. The drive capacity keeps in increasing and prices gradually drop (though, lets hope that continues, all things considered). And IMO, it's worth getting the NAS/enterprise drives. Between warranty and features/use-case, it's worth it.
-
Shucking drives is not worth the effort, yeah. I won't tell people not to do it, but I do recommend against it. Every shucked drive I have had, has failed within 3 years of purchase. And I can attest to the WD Red and Seagate NAS being good quality drives. In fact.... the seagate NAS drives I have show ~2 years for their age because the SMART data rolled over at 10 years.
-
Balancing performance, Increase Priority UI suggestions
Christopher (Drashna) replied to Lawrence's question in General
It should give a tooltip of "Increase Priority". Some of this is covered by: https://stablebit.com/Support/DrivePool/2.X/Manual?Section=Pool Organization Bar But specifically, balancing and duplication tasks use a background I/O priority. This means that other I/O (such as you reading media from the drives) gets priority over the balancing. This helps prevent these tasks from interferring with normal usage of the pool. Increasing priority means that it uses the same, "normal" priority, and may perform faster at the cost of impacting pool performance. That is correct. This only shows activity that goes through the pool driver. Balancing and duplication tasks do not, and are not shown herer. This is namely because the "performance counters" for the disks only show that information. -
Drive Pool doesn't count space on drives without letters
Christopher (Drashna) replied to NCARalph's question in General
You've been bitten by this issue: https://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_DrivePool_F3540 -
Most likely, it's more to do with the controller than the disk itself. In the advanced settings, there are a couple of options that may help, but mostly the "Unsafe" option in the "Direct I/O" section. The advanced settings are hidden until you enable them in the Scanner settings.
-
StableBit Scanner Balancer Evacuation
Christopher (Drashna) replied to CrazyHorse's question in General
You are very welcome, and glad to hear it! And hopefully, everything else is smooth sailing! -
If you don't mind a more complicated setup, you can get away with one drive for SSD Optimizer. Namely, add all of the regular drives to a pool. Then add that pool, and the SSD Optimizer to a (separate) pool. Enable duplication on the underlying pool, but not on the top level pool, and enable the SSD Optimizer just on the top level pool.
-
Well, I'm sorry to hear about the virus, but glad it was .... a simple enough issue in the end! Also, assuming that the *arr program downloaded the virus via the download client, double check that the download client is configured to block "malicious extensions" (eg, exe, lnk, bat, etc). Generally, it's a good idea to block any executible or script by default. As for the shucked drives ... yeah, that's gonna happen, unfortunately. A better alternative may be to buy recertified drives from a reputible company, as these are cheaper than new drives, and generally in very good condition.
-
StableBit Scanner Balancer Evacuation
Christopher (Drashna) replied to CrazyHorse's question in General
Well, glad that it was a simple issue! And by default, StableBit DrivePool puts new files on the disks with the most available free space, measured absolutely (eg total bytes free, not by percentage). Over time, this should lead to roughly equal usage. As for forcibly equalizing the disks, no, it's not bad to do. But the default settings are setup to minimize the amount of balancing needed. They mostly deal with specific edge cases. Because a one time move is fine, but moving files constantly can/will increase wear and tear over time. And yes, I would recommend turning off that balancer once it's run. If you add a new disk and want to equailze the usage again, turn it on until that's done. Rince and repeat. -
Glad to hear it! Though, for the reformat, in this sort of situation, I'd recommend a full, non-quick format. Namely as this basically zero's out the entire drive. (though I absolutely understand not wanting to do that, at this point)
-
Unfortunately, the SSD Optimizer isn't a true caching solution. And it's not meant to be. That said, StableBit CloudDrive operates in a way that is more like a caching solution, and in line with your expectations. But again, it's not a true caching solution, either. It sounds like you want a full on caching solution, like PrimoCache
-
Pool file duplication causing file corruption under certain circumstances
Christopher (Drashna) replied to Catch-22's question in General
I know there have been a few tickets about this. Unfortunately, neither Alex nor I have had any luck at reproducing the issues locally. If you haven't already, open a ticket at https://stablebit.com/contact If you have previously opened a ticket about this, then if you could, open a new ticket. Getting drive tracing from when this is happening would be very helpful, and can be done when opening the ticket (eg grab the logs, upload and attach during ticket creation): https://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_DrivePool_2.x_Log_Collection And afterwards, run the StableBit Troubleshooter. And as much information about the files that this is most commonly happening on. And exact steps to reproduce the issue, if possible. Because issues like this, when we can't reproduce them, are much more difficult to track down. Let alone fix. -
I hear you on that! Less complexity does mean less that can go wrong. For the UI, what do you mean that it has gone "bye-bye"? Are the UI's showing up at all but with black screens? Or not showing up at all? Or? And Veeam is very nice to use, for sure! If this is StableBit DrivePool related, and only happens when it is installed, then this might be useful for us, at least: https://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_DrivePool_System_Freeze This does trigger a BSOD (so an unsafe shutdown), but dumps the active memory to disk. This can be incredibly helpful information, if you know how to read these memory dumps (I only kinda do, but Alex, the developer, is a pro at these).
-
stablebit drivepool reports a disk as missing
Christopher (Drashna) replied to dominator99's question in General
Yeah, that +12V line will get you. IIRC, it's also further broken up by cable/rail. But definitely something to check!