Jump to content
Covecube Inc.


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    gtaus reacted to methejuggler in Plugin Source   
    Hybrid SSDs are nice for normal use, but in mixed-mode operating environments they get overwhelmed pretty quickly and start thrashing (ie. NAS with several users). There's also the problem of things like DrivePool mixing all your content up across the different drives, so the drive replaces your cached documents with a movie you decide to watch, and then the documents are slow again, even though you weren't going to watch the movie more than once. If there was a way to specify to only cache often written/edited files for increased speed, then maybe? But I think that would still run into issues with the balancer moving files between drives. The Hybrid drive wouldn't know the difference between that and legitimately newly written files.
  2. Like
    gtaus reacted to methejuggler in Plugin Source   
    Of course, I have Backblaze for cloud backup too, but re-downloading 10+ TB of data that could have been protected better locally isn't ideal.
    I'm glad to hear you've had good luck so far, but don't fool yourself - multiple drive failure happens. Keep in mind that drives fail more when they're used more. The most common situations of multiple drive failure is that one drive fails, and you need to restore those files from your redundancies. During the restore process, another drive fails due to the increased use.
    The most simultaneous failures I've heard of is 4 (not to me)... but that was in a larger raid. There's a reason for the parity drive count increasing every ~5 drives in parity based raids.
    So far, I've been quite lucky. I've never permanently lost any files due to a drive failure - but I don't want that to start due to lack of diligence on my part either, so if I can find ways to make my storage solution more reliable I will.
    In fact - one of the main reasons I went with DrivePool is that it seems more fault tolerant. Duplicates are spread between multiple drives (rather than mirroring, which relies entirely on one single other drive), so if you do lose two drives, you may lose some files, but not a full drive's worth. (Plus the lack of striping similarly makes sure that you don't lose the whole array if you can't restore.) I realize I don't need to explain any of this to someone who uses it, but just highlighting the reasons I found DP attractive in the first place - separating the duplicates amount multiple drives to reduce the chance of losses on failures. If that can be improved to further reduce those chances...
  3. Like
    gtaus reacted to methejuggler in Plugin Source   
    Currently I think my balancer works better than the official plugins. It offers all the features of all of them, but without any fighting. I also solved all the bugs I'm aware of in the disk space equalizer plugin (there were some corner cases where it balanced incorrectly).
    I'm working on some issues with the ordered placement portion and then I'll release it.
  4. Like
    gtaus reacted to methejuggler in Plugin Source   
    I actually wrote a balancing plugin yesterday which is working pretty well now. It took a bit to figure out how to make it do what I want. There's almost no documentation for it, and it doesn't seem very intuitive in many places.
    So far, I've been "combining" several of the official plugins together to make them actually work together properly. I found the official plugins like to fight each other sometimes. This means I can have SSD drop drives working with equalization and disk usage limitations with no thrashing. Currently this is working, although I ended up re-writing most of the original plugins from scratch anyway simply because they wouldn't combine very well as originally coded. Plus, the disk space equalizer plugin had some bugs in a way which made it easier to rewrite than fix.
    I wasn't able to combine the scanner plugin - it seems to be obfuscated and baked into the main source, which made it difficult to see what it was doing.
    Unfortunately, the main thing I wanted to do doesn't seem possible as far as I can tell. I had wanted to have it able to move files based on their creation/modified dates, so that I could keep new/frequently edited files on faster drives and move files that aren't edited often to slower drives. I'm hoping maybe they can make this possible in the future.
    Another idea I had hoped to do was to create drive "groups" and have it avoid putting duplicate content on the same group. The idea behind that was that drives purchased at the same time are more likely to fail around the same time, so if I avoid putting both duplicated files on those drives, there's less likelihood of losing files in the case of multiple drive failure from the same group of drives. This also doesn't seem possible right now.
  5. Like
    gtaus reacted to Shane in Cannot write to pool "Catastrophic Failure (Error 0x8000FFFF)", cannot remove disk from pool "The Media is Write Protected"   
    The drive may have failed. Do you have another computer you could test the drive in? Or if not, could you boot from a Live CD or Live USB to see if it shows up in a different OS?
  6. Like
    gtaus reacted to Smiley in Cannot write to pool "Catastrophic Failure (Error 0x8000FFFF)", cannot remove disk from pool "The Media is Write Protected"   
    Hi! I have the same issue, but worse. After this error code I rebooted my PC, and it took about 5 minutes to boot up again, and when it booted I noticed that the drive - that produced the error code when I tried to make new folder - was missing. It isn't shown in file manager and in the disk manager neither. Now I don't know what to do... 
  7. Like
    gtaus reacted to KWolfe in Cannot write to pool "Catastrophic Failure (Error 0x8000FFFF)", cannot remove disk from pool "The Media is Write Protected"   
    Thank you for posting the solution!  Same problem, same fix.  I could see this having taken me a LONG time to figure out.
  8. Like
    gtaus reacted to Christopher (Drashna) in Cannot write to pool "Catastrophic Failure (Error 0x8000FFFF)", cannot remove disk from pool "The Media is Write Protected"   
    Yuuuuup.    This happens from time to time (I've seen it 4-5 times in the last 10 years, including both my systems and other peoples, so exceptionally rare). 
    I'm glad you were able to figure this out, and posted the solution!  Hopefully, no more weird stuff for you!
  9. Like
    gtaus reacted to cocksy_boy in Cannot write to pool "Catastrophic Failure (Error 0x8000FFFF)", cannot remove disk from pool "The Media is Write Protected"   
    After posting, I found an issue I had missed: the disk was marked as Read Only in disk management. 
    After running DISKPART from cmd I managed to remove the read-only tag using the command attributes disk clear readonly  and it appears to be OK now.

  10. Like
    gtaus reacted to dsteinschneider in Windows 10 questions   
    Two years ago I tried running DrivePool on Windows 10. Everything seemed ok during the install but I had problems where Windows 7 mediacenter computers had problems opening the movie files.
    I wasn't sure if the problem was caused by the pair of MediaSonic ProBoxes connected with the Asmedia 106x SATA controller or ethernet driver issues. I just put the Windows 7 OS SSD I put aside back in and continued until now with Win7.
    I've now upgraded all the mediacenter computers to Windows 10 with Chameleon Media Center. Does anyone have a Drive Pool machine with a pair of ProBoxes/Asmedia 106 running fine in Windows 10?
  11. Like
    gtaus reacted to Kraanvelt in DrivePool - very slow to load and show pools after boot.   
    I bought DrivePool a couple days ago and it was running great for the first day. Since I have been plagued by it working correctly for 1-2 boots, then every boot afterwards takes approximately 10 minutes to load DrivePool upon logging in to Windows 10, I can open it but it said loading with the time taken so far. During this time the drive pools are inaccessible. I have had brief luck in waiting for it to load, then resetting the settings in DrivePool and then... reconfiguring the balancing (SSD Optimisation only). However, this is not an ideal situation. 
    Does anyone have any ideas than may permanently resolve the issue?
    Thanks in advance. 
  12. Like
    gtaus reacted to methejuggler in Plugin Source   
    I'm interested in extending the behavior of the current balancing plugins, but don't want to re-write them from scratch. Is there any chance the current balancing plugins could be made open source to allow the community to contribute and extend them?
  13. Thanks
    gtaus got a reaction from docjl61 in Considering changing drive letters   
    Well, there may be some scenario where drive letters are required. But with 16 HDDs in my pool, I am more than happy to assign names to the HDDs and not have to bother with drive letters. In theory, DrivePool is able to pool many more than 26 HDDs, so you would reach a point where you would run out of drive letters anyway.
    If you need to assign a drive letter to a DrivePool HDD that has a name only, you can easily do that in Disk Management and it will not affect DrivePool at all. Again, DrivePool does not read the drive letter at all. It only uses the hidden PoolPart directory for identification.
    As mentioned, you may have to restart your computer if you decide to reassign drive letters to your DrivePool HDDs, not for DrivePool itself, but sometimes other Windows program will not recognize the newly named drive without a restart. IIRC, Disk Management will warn you about that when you change/add/remove a drive letter.
  14. Thanks
    gtaus got a reaction from docjl61 in Considering changing drive letters   
    FWIW, I just removed all drive letters from my DrivePool HDDs. DrivePool does not need a drive letter to recognize a HDD in the pool. It uses the hidden PoolPart directory.
    Removing drive letters on the HDDs makes a less cluttered display in Windows 10 File Explorer as it will only show HDDs with drive letters. That works great for me as I currently have 16 HDDs in my DrivePool. Those HDDs are dedicated to DrivePool and nothing else. So I don't need any drive letters assigned to them.
    Of course, when you remove the drive letters, Windows 10 File Explorer can longer "see" the drive normally. You would have to go back into Disk Management and reassign a drive letter.
    I track all my pool HDDs by name, such as DP01, DP02, DP03, etc.... which also corresponds to the physical location on my rack. I also put the drive name sticker on the physical drive/case for easy identification. The HDDs in my pool do not have drive letters assigned to them, as I stated. The DrivePool UI lists the names all in alphabetic order, which is very nice. However, if for some reason I want to reassign a drive letter to a particular drive, I just use Disk Management and look up the HDD by name. That is much easier then trying to track all the S/N of the HDDs.
    I am not using Scanner, so I am not sure if that program requires drive letters to work. Is there some reason you need/want to keep any drive letters assigned to your pool HDDs? I found DrivePool was easier to work with when I removed all those drive letters from my pool HDDs. Just my thoughts to your initial question on how to not drive yourself crazy with numerous drives in DrivePool.
  15. Like
    gtaus reacted to docjl61 in Considering changing drive letters   
    I just removed the letters on all 8 pool drives and nothing exploded!
    Same for SB scanner, business as usual (except for now blank drive letters
    You now have me interested in leaving them unlettered, but there must be a scenario/usage case where lettered pool drives are desirable.
    Should a need arise, I could always revert to letters, but I'll leave them out for now and see how it goes.
    Thanks @gtaus
  16. Like
    gtaus got a reaction from docjl61 in Considering changing drive letters   
    Yeah, old habits... When I removed the drive letters and just used drive names, life with DrivePool became easier with my 16 HDDs. It works better for me.
  17. Like
    gtaus reacted to docjl61 in Considering changing drive letters   
    This sounds like good news to me
    I think when I started using drivepool, individual drives were "letter-less" (file explorer would only show pool drives, and non-pooled OS drive also, obviously)..
    For a specific reason I fail to remember (lets call it old habits), I switched to lettering and never looked back once.
    Thanks !
  18. Like
    gtaus reacted to Shane in How to I get automatic notices of replies to my questions?   
    Hi gtaus, I can see that your account is following this thread, so hopefully you'll get notified about this response.
    Maybe check that https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/notifications/options/ is set to your liking?
  19. Like
    gtaus reacted to Shane in File Placement, how to add new HDD for only backup files   
    Checking, it seems the ST6000DM003 is a SMR drive. I don't recommend putting it in any pool where you want decent rewrite performance, but if you're only wanting good read performance it's fine.
  20. Like
    gtaus reacted to Shane in File Placement, how to add new HDD for only backup files   
    ... Would that 6TB USB HDD happen to be a Seagate Backup Plus Hub by any chance?
    Because I bought one a ways back (P/N 1XAAP2-501) and it behaves exactly the same way you've described. The drive inside might actually be okay, just with a lemon enclosure. Since yours is out of warranty and you're planning to ditch it, consider instead shucking it and using the HDD as an internal drive (run the Seagate long test on it again of course).
    BTW just FYI, Seagate has used SMR drives in its Backup Plus Hubs and I don't recommend using SMR drives in a pool, so also check the part number of the drive itself to see if it is one, with (if you don't want to open it up to check) a utility like Crystal Disk Info or similar.
  21. Like
    gtaus reacted to Umfriend in File Placement, how to add new HDD for only backup files   
    I think a 2nd Pool for non-critical data using old hardware is an excellent idea.
  22. Like
    gtaus got a reaction from Shane in File Placement, how to add new HDD for only backup files   
    Well, my excellent idea has proven successful, but maybe in an unexpected way. I created a 2nd DrivePool for my non-critical \movie\ data using my suspect 6TB USB HDD. Everything seemed to be working fine as I used Teracopy to move 6TB of \movie\ files to the new DrivePool using the verify command to ensure all files were 100% correct upon transfer. Everything worked fine for a day or two. Thinking I was good to go, I was about to add some more older HDDs to that 2nd DrivePool when, for whatever reason, that 2nd DrivePool went offline and I could not access it (only the suspect 6TB USB HDD on the pool at that time). Fortunately for me, I only had that one suspect 6TB HDD on the 2nd DrivePool at that time, so troubleshooting was fast and easy. Turns out, that suspect 6TB HDD has a tendency to shut itself down, go offline, and then throw the DrivePool into an error state. I was able to unplug the 6TB, plug it back in, and then both the drive and the 2nd DrivePool came back to life.
    This happened a couple more times yesterday, with that 6TB USB HDD going offline seemingly random, requiring me to unplug it and then plug it back in, so I decided it was just not worth the trouble trying to salvage use out of that 6TB HDD anymore. I am currently in the process of using Teracopy with verify to move all the \movies\ file off that 2nd DrivePool with only the 6TB USB HDD back to my original DrivePool. 
    Turns out that creating a 2nd DrivePool using only that suspect 6TB USB HDD was a good idea because I quickly was able to determine there is indeed something wrong with it (despite all the diagnostic programs that scan it and report it is working fine). The only program that correctly determined the HDD was failing was Seagate Seatools using the long generic test (it passed the short tests). Unfortunately, the HDD is out of warranty so I will have to just eat the loss and move on.
    But, I would like to shout out to Stablebit Drivepool because, even though that 6TB HDD is failing, my data seems to be recoverable. I am currently about 50% complete on the file transfer off that suspect HDD and all files are intact. I can guarantee you that if that same suspect HDD had gone bad in my MS Windows 10 Storage Spaces setup, using data packets spread all over the pool, it would have most assuredly crashed the entire Storage Space and all my data would have been lost. How do I know that? Because I used Storage Spaces for years and after my 3rd catastrophic loss of data due to a HDD failure, I moved over to Storage Spaces. Despite having 2 and even 3 HDD failure protection on Storage Spaces, I lost entire pools of data when only 1 drive out 20 drives went bad. I guess I can attest to the fact that when a HDD goes bad in DrivePool, I have been able to recover my data off that failing HDD. For my few folder/files that require duplication, I have 2x or 3x duplication set and with DrivePool I don't worry that any 1 drive will crash my entire pool.
    Thanks to everyone for their responses and helping me work through this issue.
  23. Like
    gtaus reacted to Umfriend in File Placement, how to add new HDD for only backup files   
    I have never tried to use File Placement Rules but as I understand it, if you tell DP to place \movies on that 6TB HDD then it will and also spill over to other drives when the 6TB HDD is full. DP will not, I think, through a no space error. Not sure how to ensure that non other data arrives on that drive, that might need a lot of FPRs, but may be easy.
    Having said that, I would not add a drive I am suspicious about if, unlike me, you do not use duplication. Do you have Scanner? Maybe run the Seagate tool again.
  24. Like
    gtaus reacted to Spider99 in File Placement, how to add new HDD for only backup files   
    another way would be if you dont need duplication
    1 dont add the disk to the pool
    2 use backup software - set a job to copy the changed/added files to it - nightly job or similar
    simpler and you dont have to mess with FPR's that may get complex
    also you can detach it and move it to another pc without having to remove it from DP as it would throw an error
  25. Like
    gtaus reacted to Shane in File Placement, how to add new HDD for only backup files   
    In the File Placement Rules section:
    your FIRST (uppermost) rule should be that all files matching "\movies\*" are to be placed on all drives INCLUDING that one (check all drives) your LAST (lowermost) rule should be that all files matching "*" are to be placed on all drives EXCLUDING that one (check all the others, leave it unticked, and in your particular case you also want to select "Never allow files to be placed on any other disks" for this rule). Any other rules you might have should be placed ABOVE the LAST rule, and should not have that drive checked (and again, you may wish to select "Never allow..."). This is because FPR checks the rules from uppermost to lowermost until it finds a matching rule for the file being balanced and then uses only that rule.
    NOTE that File Placement is only performed when balancing is triggered instead of in real time; you might wish to use the SSD Optimizer balancer plugin to mark at least one of the other disks as "SSD" so that new files are never even temporarily placed on the 6TB HDD, which is otherwise possible even if you have "Balance immediately" selected in the Settings tab.
  • Create New...