Jump to content

Christopher (Drashna)

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Reputation Activity

  1. Thanks
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from player in windows file explorer opens automatically   
    It is. 
    However, you should be able to set the "override" value for "CloudFsDisk_IsDriveRemovable" to "false", and it may fixe the issue. But the drive will no longer be treated as a removable drive. 
  2. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from bob19 in Is this forum (or maybe the company) dead?   
    Nope, definitely not dead! 
    But if it's urgent, or basically, it's the best way, direct any support queries to https://stablebit.com/Contact
  3. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from silk in Manualy delete duplicates?   
    StableBit DrivePool doesn't have a master and subordinate/duplicate copy. Both are equally viable, and treated as such.  This is very different from how Drive Bender handles things.5
    As for being documented, not really, but sort of. Eg: https://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_DrivePool_Knowledge_base#How_To.27s
    That said, if the data is in the same relative path under the PoolPart folders, they're considered duplicates.  Changing the duplication settings, or even remeasuring can kick off a duplication pass that will automatically prune the duplicates, as needed. 
    Also, the "dpcmd" utility has an option to disable duplication for the entire pool, recursively. However, that kicks off a duplication pass that actually manages the files. 
    Just have both products installed. That's it.  You can fine tune settings in StableBit DrivePool, in the balancing settings, as the "StableBit Scanner" balancer is one of the 5 preinstalled balancer plugins. 

    That should be fixed now.  Though, the file system scan won't trigger the drive evacuation.  And yeah, that fix was shipping in the 2.5.5 version, and the latest stable release is 2.5.6, so this definitely shouldn't be an issue anymore.  (we haven't seen it in a while). 
  4. Haha
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to Chris Downs in Read Speed Slowed by DrivePool?   
    Now I have an image of you having some sort of steampunk mechanical networking setup...
  5. Thanks
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from Milo in Drive evacuation priority   
    Honestly, I'm not sure.    I suspect that the processing is per drive, rather than duplicated/unduplicated, first.   
    Since I'm not sure, I've opened a request, to ask Alex (the Developer).
    Not currently.   It would require a change to both StableBit DrivePool and StableBit Scanner to facilitate this.  
    My recommendation would be to just evacuate unduplicated data on SMART warnings. 
  6. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to Umfriend in DrivePool not filling new empty disks immediately?   
    So when you add a 6TB HDD to that setup, and assuming you have not tinkered with the balancing settings, any _new_ files would be stored on that 6TB HDD indeed. A rebalancing pass, which you can start manually, will fill it up as well. With default settings, DP will try to ensure that each disk has the same amount of free space. It would therefore write to the 6TB first until 4TB is fee. Then equally to the 6TB and 4TB until both have 3TB free etc. The 500GB HDD will see action only when the others have 500GB or less available.
    This is at default settings and without duplication.
  7. Thanks
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to GameGod in PoolDrive shows no data from HDs in the pool   
    I believe you need to seed the pool. See Pool Seeding
  8. Thanks
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from skapy in FAQ - Unduplicated vs Duplicated vs Other vs Unusable   
    To clarify (and make it simple to find), here is Alex's official definition of that "Other" space:
  9. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from TeleFragger in moving drives around   
    Yeah, as long as the drives show up correctly, then it will maintain the pool. 
    As for the power savings, that entirely depends on the power consumption, both at peak and idle.  
    And to be honest, you probably won't see a lot of power savings.  The best way to get that savings is to use large capacity SSDs, which is what data centers do.  However, they can be a LOT more expensive. 
  10. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to ilikemonkeys in Stupid question from a first time user. Does drive pool provide access to data already on the drives in the pool?   
    I'm always impressed with the extent you go to help people with their questions, no matter how easy it complex.   Thanks Chris.  
  11. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from jdrch in Avira's heuristic scanner detecting Cove.Troubleshooting.ni.dll (DrivePool.Service.exe) as active malware   
    Yes, that's definitely a false positive. 
    It's just some of the troubleshooting stuff for the UI.  It's nothing harmful.  
    And if you check, the file should be digitally signed.  A good indicator that it's legit. 
  12. Thanks
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to RG9400 in Scanner detecting file system issues with CloudDrive and my SSD   
    Sure. I purchased and installed PartedMagic onto a USB. I then booted using this USB to run a Secure Erase, but it was not able to complete successfully. So I ran DD (through PartedMagic as well) on the drive around 5 times. I then converted the disk to GPT using diskpart and installed a fresh copy of Windows. I used CHKDSK, StableBit Scanner, and Intel SSD Toolbox (Full Diagnostic) to confirm that read/writes were functioning as intended. 
    Based on what I could understand from Intel, it seems like the Optane drives are fairly unique due to their usage of 3D XPoint technology which caused the specific/strange behavior I was facing. 
  13. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to toxic in Adding recovered drive by Snapraid again to the pool   
    I definitely suggest configuring snapraid so it points to the drivepool folder with the GUID inside the config file so that it's much easier to restore. Snapraid doesn't have to be the root of the drive, it can be anywhere you like (as long as they are on different psychical drives).
    So instead of doing:
    data d1 z:\ data d2 y:\ data d3 x:\ You do:
    data d1 z:\drivepool.{guid}\ data d2 y:\drivepool.{guid}\ data d3 x:\drivepool.{guid}\ That way after a failure e.g d2 dies, you drop your new drive in, add it to the pool, get the new GUID from the new drive, and edit your snapraid conf to comment out the old drive and add the new one by changing d2 y:\drivepool.{guid}\ to d2 y:\drivepool.{newguid}\ like so:
    data d1 z:\drivepool.{guid}\ #data d2 y:\drivepool.{guid}\ data d2 y:\drivepool.{newguid}\ data d3 x:\drivepool.{guid}\ Then run your fix and it all just works - and you don't have to move your files around. 
  14. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from Drakken14 in Feature Request? Overall View of all Drive Actions   
    It's not a bad idea, at all.  
    Add a request for "all drives" in the reporting, as well, as more robust reporting, in general. 
    That said, this won't make it into the 1.0 release, most likely. Alex doesn't want to add any more features right now, as we want to get the software "out the door".  But after that, we will be adding a bunch of providers, and addressing feature requests like this. 
  15. Sad
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from jenesuispasbavard in Any way to change the measure-on-every-reconnect behavior?   
    Unfortunately, no, there isn't.  
    It's been asked before, but we don't have any plans on adding an option, since it introduces too many potential issues. 
  16. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to Dizzy in Add a 4 or 5 bay Enclosure connected thru eSATA controller card to my Server.   
    Get a Norco box for the drives, and a LSI Host Bus Adapter with External SAS connectors.  Then plug the internal SAS connector into the backplane of the Norco box, and the external connector to the external connector of the HBA.
  17. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from fly in Drivepool SSD + Archive and SnapRAID?   
    Sorry for the delay!
    Seed it, just like a normal pool:
    And the rest looks good
  18. Thanks
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from bob19 in Does scanner remember scan status between reboots?   
    Well, normally, I'd agree with you.  But StableBit Scanner isn't tracking the scan as one whole thing.   It actually uses a sector map of the drive. So it tracks sections of the drive, independently.   Each section is checked based on that status, and it over time, spreads out when the scanning happens. And should actually make it more intelligently scan (by ideally scanning at times and days when the drives are less likely to be active). 
    You can check out this by double clicking on the disk, and looking at the sector map.  It will show different colors for different regions.
  19. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to JulesTop in Pools, Cloud Drive, and Duplication (Optimal configuration question)   
    OK, I came up with a solution to my own problem which will likely be the best of both worlds.
    Setup my Cloud Pool to Pool Duplicate, also setup my HDD Pool to Pool Duplicate.
    Then use both the pools in the storage pool with no duplication as normal.
  20. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to billis777 in How many hdds an evga 1600w t2 can support?   
    Found it, thank you! It was the serial number i was looking for.
  21. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to Wiidesire in [Bug?] Prior scan data and settings not preserved on update   
    The problem is that you were still on an affected version 3216. By upgrading to the newest version the Stablebit Scanner Service is forcefully shut down, thus the DiskId files can get corrupted in the upgrade process. Now that you are on version 3246 which fixed the problem it shouldn't happen anymore on your next upgrade/reboot/crash.
    I agree wholeheartedly though that we should get a way to backup the scan status of drives just in case. A scheduled automatic backup would be great. The files are extremely small and don't take a lot of space so don't see a reason not to implement it feature wise.
  22. Thanks
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from jdwarne in Disk Activity   
    Unfortunately, it may be. 
    There is a setting that we have enabled by default that may be causing this behavior.  Specifically, the BitLocker setting. 
    This setting queries the system for data, which creates a WMI query, which causes disk activity.  
    That said, you can disable this:
    And the setting is "BitLocker_CloudPartUnlockDetect", which is actually used in the example.  Set the "override" value to "false", save the file and reboot the system.  That should fix the issue, hopefully. 
  23. Thanks
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from Mick Mickle in Stablebit Scanner loses all settings on unexpected shutdowns.   
    Well, a number of others were having this as well, and I've posted this info in a number of those threads, so hopefully, confirmation will come soon.  
  24. Thanks
    Christopher (Drashna) got a reaction from Chris Downs in Performance column empty   
    This information is pulled from Windows' Performance counters. 
    So it may not have been working properly temporarily. 
    Worst case, you can reset them: http://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_DrivePool_Q2150495
  25. Like
    Christopher (Drashna) reacted to steffenmand in Request: Increased block size   
    i think you mean mbit :-P
    Yes. It all depends on the response time you have. Speed is not the issue, it's my response time to google's servers You're just lucky to be closer.

    Plus i got upload verification on, that also cuts off speeds on uploads  I get around 2500-2800 ms response time pr. thread and then instant download. So the less calls and the bigger download would do wonders for me
  • Create New...