-
Posts
544 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
39
Reputation Activity
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Christopher (Drashna) in Down sizing my server
Happy New Year!
the i3 has a passmark of about 5000
that will do a one or possibly 2 transcodes - depending on what you are transcoding
for comparison my qnap 853a with a n3150 (passmark 1600) can barely do a 1080p transcode - so you need a passmark of 2000+ to transcode on the fly a H264 1080p file - for HVEC and larger frame size you will need more power.
Emby does have support for intel quicksync - although its still experimental - but does work - which can help to lower the load - the i3 will be better for this as well
I pre transcode my video's so the clients can play them natively so the server does not work that hard - in that case a celeron would do fine as a file server
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Christopher (Drashna) in Establishing a pool over existing drives
Yes thats the "quick and dirty" method - i used it when i setup my pool - 30TB+
As the data is on the disks its a "move" (from outside to inside the poolpart folder) rather than a copy process so is very quick as you are just changing the file location on the disk(s)
-
Spider99 got a reaction from rogerpinet in Placement in different controllers and/or groups of disks
You could create two pools - one for each controller - with no duplication
then make a new pool of the the two pools with duplication - i.e a pool of pools
-
Spider99 got a reaction from vapedrib in Usb Backup Drives
I got myself three Seagate Backup Plus Hub 8 drives to do some deep backup storage https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B01IAD5ZC6/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
scanner see's them fine and chugs away checking the disks
But i was surprised when i swapped one for another that scanner was not picking up that the drive was different - i even gave it a clue as i changed the drive letter and named the volume differently and the signature of the disk would be different as well as the serial number
Scanner was attributing the scan results from the old drive to the new drive - which could be a problem and/or lead to confusion.
Yes these are USb drives but scanner is picking up all the Disk Details with no problem.
I closed the UI between swapping the drives
-
Spider99 reacted to JazzMan in My Storage Server
I bought the Q30 including the mobo, raid card and power supply from them. They list a few sample configurations on their site, and have a configurator for more choices, but when I dealt with them they were super flexible in working with each clients' specific needs. The configurator can be a starting point but then you can order off the menu. In my use case I wanted a different CPU than what they had on the configuraator; they could not source the specific one I asked for but understood my requirements and suggested an appropriate alternative they could source.
You can check out these articles if you are not familiar with storage pods;
https://www.extremetech.com/computing/178757-how-to-build-your-own-180tb-raid6-storage-array-for-9305
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/open-source-data-storage-server/
or search the web for something like "backblaze storage pod" and maybe add "open source" if you really are interested in just acquiring a case from a metal shop and not all the internals.
For some history as I understand it;
45Drives was an early supplier to BackBlaze but is no longer. I think BackBlaze is up to version 6 or higher of the pod. Around version 4 or so, BackBlaze switched to BackupPods.com and possibly others as suppliers of the pods. However the pod designs are open source and can be bought and put together from a parts list if one desires.
I needed something that arrived working and was not a server build learning experience, so I bought a system assembled and tested sans drives. I then just dropped my drives in, installed Win 7 and DP and was basically ready to go. Most drives were moved from some other computers, one of which had been running DP, and I added a few blank drives, so I did have to move some files around to get them into the new pool and duplicated properly.
http://www.45drives.com/
https://www.backuppods.com/
http://protocase.com/products/electronic-enclosures/45drives-storage-pods.php
My perhaps faulty recollection was that 45Drives wouldn't necessarily sell you all the nuts and bolts and individual parts one by one like at Radio Shack of old but would be very flexible in putting together (or leaving out) the major electronic components that go into a server to a clients' needs, and that BackupBods was the opposite on either ends of that;.they would either sell you a completely built working machine with all the drives and little customization, or they would sell you all the nuts and bolts and individual parts a la carte to assemble yourself.
I'd contact both companies and explain what you are looking for. (metal case, metal case with backplanes, etc.) Protocase is the metal fab shop for 45Drives, so if you really are just interested in the chassis and not the backplanes, etc, you could contact them.
This info may have changed in the past 1.5 years.
Cheers,
David
-
Spider99 got a reaction from vapedrib in Latest Stats and PR from Backblaze
Here you go so more stats on HDD failures
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-failure-rates-q3-2016/
I am going to tune in for their Friday webinar to see what they have to say
-
Spider99 got a reaction from vapedrib in Essentials 2012 R2
Hi
Proud owner of a shinny new Essential Server
Its along time since i played with Windows server - some things are the same but a lot has changed so....
Any recommendations on what to read/watch on how to set it up and use some of the features etc
There appears to be a lot of info but where to start with a good guide etc?
Thanks
T
-
-
Spider99 reacted to JazzMan in Pool Order
Is it possible to reorder the way the pools appear in the UI and/or the order in which they are measured?
At the moment my large G Pool is listed first in the UI and is re-measured first whenever is considered inconsistent.
I'd like my smaller D pool to be first in the UI and "Next Pool" would take me to the G pool. D is more important, would re-measure quicker, and D comes before G in the alphabet.
Thanks,
David
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Christopher (Drashna) in Hide Drives In Pool
similar to Chris
Large part of mine is Blu-ray backup copies, Movies and TV series ripped, home movies plus historical data etc etc
Duplicated mostly except the Blu-Ray backup copies as still have the original media
I think you better start collecting to catch up
-
Spider99 got a reaction from awraynor in Hide Drives In Pool
similar to Chris
Large part of mine is Blu-ray backup copies, Movies and TV series ripped, home movies plus historical data etc etc
Duplicated mostly except the Blu-Ray backup copies as still have the original media
I think you better start collecting to catch up
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Christopher (Drashna) in "Other" Data but shouldn't be
10x/x2 means the folder containing the file is across 10 disks (poolparts) and the file is duplicated twice on 2 of the 10 disks
x2 is the expected number of parts
if you look at the example in the dpcmd thread it shows a x3/x2 with 3 poolparts and two copies
if you have 10 disks the root folder will be on all disks - sub directories may or may not be on all disks as you go down the tree of directories the number of disks containing directories generally decreases down to x2(or more) at the bottom of the tree.
In the gui if you put your mouse over each disk in turn it will amongst other things show you how much "other" is on each disk - you might find one disk has a lot more than the others
On a pool of 13 disks - i have 16.3gb on another pool of 20 disks i have 11.9GB - it goes up and down while it balances as it moves data from my ssd's to the pool as the "in transit" data gets added to the "other" until its fully copied - hence why you see it going up and down - if its large files being moved you can see the "other" data as its added to a disk "grey" bit which then turns blue when fully copied. Each disk has a few hundred meg of other - mostly ntfs data that you cannot see or access and its only because DP shows it to you that its an "issue" - in normal windows you cant see this data so you dont know its there but it is - its usually the master files records for the disk a database managed by windows all normal as long as its does no get into the multi 10's gb range which it looks like your are not. Also as Chris said if you have data outside the poolparts directory this will be counted as other as well. Also any System Volume Information directories are another culprit with volume snapshots etc (pia mostly)
Have fun
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Antoineki in Essentials 2012 R2
Hi
Proud owner of a shinny new Essential Server
Its along time since i played with Windows server - some things are the same but a lot has changed so....
Any recommendations on what to read/watch on how to set it up and use some of the features etc
There appears to be a lot of info but where to start with a good guide etc?
Thanks
T
-
Spider99 reacted to Umfriend in File placement based on folder
Uhm, I actually want DP to be as simple and fast as possible and would prefer not to have fancy placement stuff in there. But then, I consider the File Placement Rules evil as well. My fear would be that as DP does more, it becomes more vulnerable to bugs and user mishaps. I wonder (but I may be well off here) whether using seperate HDDs and then defining libraries in Windows would not be a more logical solution for the suggested function here.
One of my main concerns is that (and I have looked at the UnRAID link provided above briefly) either DP can not guarantee placement as expected, causing issues when one expects to recover easily, or must check and produce error reports. Let's say for instance that you want a certain folder on one HDD, the folder size is 3TB and the biggest HDD is 2TB. What should it do? It may then spill over to others (this is what happens with File Placement Rules if I am not mistaken) but unless this is reported clearly, a user may still be off as bad as with random placement (where the user knows placement is "random"). If it is reported clearly then the user must still micromanage. DP may also say there is not enough space but you might have a 10TB Pool with 5TB free and still run into this. Another concern is that DP would have to become more context-aware when placing files or balancing and, when free space becomes limited, may need to reshuffle entire folders to make room for an addition to another. The UnRaid document alludes to such issues as well with their implementation of split levels (and as far as I can tell it does not do a reshuffling at all but errors out on free space even if in the aggregate there is a lot available).
I prefer DP to offer a single virtual drive and manage placement as it seems fit (use least occupied HDD or fill all equal %-age), run as unattended as possible and, if you have duplication, it will recover itself (for instance if you have a hierarchic Pool with one base-Pool/string as Amazon Cloud Drive Unlimited with a 500 Mbit connection and local HDDs as the other base-Pool/string). If it becomes bloated with user options and suffers in stability then that would, IMHO, be a bad thing.
Anyway, just my 0.02$ worth.
-
Spider99 reacted to Christopher (Drashna) in Gallbladders suck
And all is "done" for now.
Had the stents removed and the drain removed (last month, actually).
And I'm doing fine now. Still need to be careful about how much fat I eat, but that's a good thing (IMO).
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Christopher (Drashna) in Wd red drives 3Tb or 4 Tb any problems with either
Hi
Red pro are noisy and run hot although a good drive - but expensive for what you get if you are not going to use them in a NAS
i have HGST (4tb) drives and they are fast at 170 + MB/s when lightly filled when full they drop down to ~ 120 MB/s with large files
SSD's obviously significantly faster
Have you thought of Raid 0 for stream - as long as you have a good backup strategy to protect your data - then cheaper/smaller SSD's could be used as a failure will take out the whole raid as 0 has no redundancy
-
Spider99 got a reaction from docjl61 in A new pool always starts off as an empty drive.
did the drives have files on before you combined them into the pool?
if so you need to move the files into the poolpart (hidden) directory on the drives then they will appear in the pool
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Christopher (Drashna) in Formatting Media server PC
Assuming the c: drive is not part of the pool then you have little to worry about
re installing win 7 will only install on the c: drive - you are in control of that anyway - or just disconnect the power leads to the pool drives while you do the install
then reinstall DP/Scanner etc and the pool will be recognised by default
If the drives come back with different letters just change them in disk management before you install any other software
As for the backup - look at something like syncbackpro - there is a free version as well
RDP will be fine
-
Spider99 got a reaction from LavetaJef in SMART used as a predictor of failure?
Interesting article from backBlaze on SMART info
Not definitive but interesting
Wish they would learn how to present stats and % properly as it makes it difficult to figure out what the numbers mean!
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/what-smart-stats-indicate-hard-drive-failures/
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Bluetac in Need Advice On SATA Controller Purchase
lol - yes have three of the 950 Pro's
doubt you need to raid 0 them as you are unlikely to have anything that will stress them
Make sure you get Samsung Magician and the Samsung NVME drivers as Windows 10 only has a basic driver
IIRC scanner might have issues with getting the SMART info off the drives - but it will get fixed im sure
Make sure the NVME drives are very well cooled as the run very hot 60-80c in operation and can easily overheat - then they throttle their speed
Enjoy
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Ginoliggime in Migrating 40 TB ext4 file
Yes its essentials - had it happen a few times yesterday when creating directories on a shared drive via windows explorer
that shared drive is under server folders not shared folders
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Bluetac in Samsung 850 pro 128 gig smart issue
The life for your ssd is 150TB
so 15Tb per year
you are well under per year
My 2012r2 is very chatty with its disk at about 4tb for 4-5 months
If you look in scanner there is an almost constant read/write going on - i have yet to find the culprit(s) even with search turned off
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Bluetac in Samsung 850 pro 128 gig smart issue
its three+ years old i would plan for a replacement pronto
keep a close eye on the 220's and see if its changing (which i suspect it is)
SSD's only have so much life and when it runs out the disk goes read only
how much has it written - its in the smart info further down
-
Spider99 got a reaction from Christopher (Drashna) in Samsung 850 pro 128 gig smart issue
its three+ years old i would plan for a replacement pronto
keep a close eye on the 220's and see if its changing (which i suspect it is)
SSD's only have so much life and when it runs out the disk goes read only
how much has it written - its in the smart info further down
-
Spider99 reacted to NfiniteZERO in Recycling old PC for Home Server/NAS duty
Thanks for the great responses!
I'm going to mark this as "Solved" and maybe get to work on setting this thing up - mostly because my laptop is still out of commission and it looks like I need to buy tires for my truck.
Hoping to pop back in with pics once it's up and running.
Cheers!