Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


tcz06a last won the day on May 19 2016

tcz06a had the most liked content!

tcz06a's Achievements

  1. My download is 1gpbs, and upload is 60mbps, and I have no throttle settings enabled.
  2. I have also created a support case with logs for this issue. Happy to provide further assistance as needed.
  3. I am logging now and will create the case as soon as I see it happen again. I also notice that each time I reauthorize, the Stablebit CloudDrive app is incremented a number, ie: Stablebit CloudDrive (9)
  4. I can confirm this behavior in the 975 RC. Windows Server 2016 x64 with an unlimited Google Apps account. Any other information I can provide I am happy to.
  5. In my opinion, I think a drive with such a measly SMART attribute set is not necessarily any more or less suitable for most people's needs. It does pose, I think, a greater liability, insomuch as you have fewer attributes to indicate the drive's health and overall fitness. Had I known beforehand, I would have chosen a different drive. I left feedback expressing this with WD. If it is working alright for you now, you will simply need to remain extra vigilant of its health yourself. Fortunately, StableBit Scanner's core scanning features can be leveraged for this easily.
  6. This is the drive I purchased: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822235121 I was able to get a bit more info from it, I think, when I used the program smartctl. That was a while ago, though. I don't recall if it was useful. I will be keenly interested if Alex is able to eke out any more useful data from this drive. If you want any additional info, such as firmware revisions, etc., I am happy to help.
  7. Based on my research with this drive, and using a plethora of tools to probe for SMART data, I believe that the drive simply is not tracking anything besides those four attributes. Perhaps more information is recorded by, and in, the drive's firmware, but not in SMART. It is disappointing, but there isn't anything to be done about it for now.
  8. Looks like you are correct. Using smartmontools to see everything about the drive shows a bit more than Scanner, I think, but still lacks any power on hours. Which seems like a step back, in my opinion. Thank you, again, for the assistance.
  9. I am happy to report that the problem sectors are not reporting as damaged now. Scanner is still not showing the age of the HD, though. Might that be due to the non-manufacturer specific interpretation of its SMART data? Whatever the reason, it is a minor concern. I am very happy that the provided update seems to have corrected the bad sectors issue. Thank you!
  10. I have recently purchased a new USB drive, and StableBit Scanner is using non-manufacturer specific interpretation rules for it. I have also found that Scanner cannot read from 1705 sectors near the beginning of the disk, although 4 other utilities are reporting able to read and write to those sectors. I am using Scanner Beta v2.5.2.3103 I noticed that Scanner is not able to read how old the drive is, when it could on an older model of WD My Passport 2TB drive. If I can provide any further information, please let me know. I am attaching several images to detail the disk. The included attachments have information from: CoveCube DirectIO Tool StableBit Scanner CrystalDiskInfo I wonder if Scanner is somehow incorrect about those 1705 sectors being damaged, perhaps due to not communicating with the disk correctly. For example, DirectIO seems to think this is an SSD when it is not. -Tomas CrystalDiskInfo7_0_4.txt direct.txt
  11. Thanks, thnz. I have marked your reply as the best answer.
  12. Interesting. That would make sense. Although, I could have sworn it had been displaying uploaded data in the right pie chart.
  13. I am also experiencing this issue in b606, and enabled disk tracing before replicating it. How long should I let it go before force stopping it? I also assume I would upload the logs via the form at http://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_CloudDrive_Log_Collectionalong with relevant details, and a link to this topic. Edit: I did not go through the same steps as the original poster above. I created a 10 GB drive with no options changed besides its name.
  14. Hello! I created a 10 TB cloud drive, and have been slowly filling it up with data. I noticed that sometime during this process, The GUI's right pie chart, where the cloud drive's details are displayed, has become possibly incongruous with what the drive reports in Windows File Explorer. I will attach a picture of them to show what I mean. Should the pie chart reflect how much of the cloud drive is in use, and should it be roughly equivalent to what Windows thinks is on it? I have uploaded ~955GB to it, which Windows picks up as there, but the pie chart is not showing. If this is not supposed to happen, I would be happy to provide logs, or whatnot, to suss out the cause. Edit: I have beta v597 (or close to it) installed at first. Just yesterday I updated to build 606. I have a pretty good Internet connection, at 200 down, 20 up, with no bandwidth cap, so reupping or redownloading any amount of data is no problem.
  • Create New...