Jump to content
Covecube Inc.


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. That is still not explaining why the entire pool needs to be checked. I disconnect only small part of the pool, I'm assuming the pooling software knows what is (or was) on that part, that disk that got temporarily removed for a few seconds, otherwise using a drivepool would not make any sense. So the question remains: Why does it have to actually *read* the entire pool of data from disks that don't even have any of the data that was on the removed disk?
  2. I understand that it needs to at least roughly check *that* disk, but it checks the entire pool again (reads all disks). That really seems overkill. It's 2019, aren't we at a level (of AI) where it can grasp the fact that if one disk was removed, it was disconnected for less than, say, 5 minutes, software should wonder if that was intended or not, and if not, just decide it wasn't? And then only (prompt to) check what changed on *that* disk alone?
  3. I still feel it's doing the "Measuring..." way too soon and too often. Just now I accidentally removed a drive, put it back in immediately, and now it's decided to measure the entire pool (32 Terabytes of data) again. This is not good for the drives, a lot of bonus wear and tear, a lot of bonus reads (and probably writes as well), and waste of time and resources. Perhaps a good idea to make the trigger for "Measuring..." user configurable? I mean, to me this comes across as serious overkill, the fact that one pool member just shortly got disconnected does not warrant yet another scan of the en
  4. If it would be file corruption, scandisk would have solved it. It didn't find any corruption. Memory/RAM is all fine. Upon closer look, the files that DrivePool had trouble with could be moved within the pool, but not deleted (also not manually, not from any pool-member outside of StableBit control). Really strange. They were old files (pre 2000), from really old HDD sources that I've copied to the pool long ago. Apparently, according to MicroSoft, they had a permission order problem. All the solutions MS offered against that did not solve it, but using lockhunter on the folder they were
  5. I ran chkdsk /f /r /x on all drives in the pool. Didn't find anything bad. However, now Pool Organization keeps halting with warnings of "mismatching file parts" and DrivePool asks me if I want to automatically delete the older file parts or let me manually delete the incorrect ones. Which surprises me is that DrivePool doesn't see which of the file versions is broken, since thus far the ones mentioned under the halted error's details list all clearly have only 1 version that's correct, namely the one that has a correct CRC32. All were old rar files, apparently some on some disk were not OK, b
  6. It seems awful overkill that Stablebit DrivePool does 'measuring' whenever I rebooted the OS. Can't it just continue where it left off, recall last state? Is there a config switch I've overlooked, where I can tell it not to rescan all files on all drives at boottime?
  7. Like I already wrote; For me backup policies only exist in order to have data off-site and/or offline. I use my own nextcloud cluster servers, syncthing and rsync for that, in several different sync to backup setups.
  8. Julius

    DrivePool + Primocache

    I've been an avid (paying) user of SoftPerfect RAM Disk. I wonder if I could set aside some RAM for my DrivePool using that. Any ideas? Generally I have all my user profiles and portable apps on a RAM disk. That gets stored away at shutdown (and at a set interval, like with primo) and re-opens at startup.
  9. Again, this is highly exaggerated. I have USB flash drives that have been used since the early 2000s that are still holding the data that was written on it the last time, somewhere in 2004. If your USB flash storage medium is of any decent brand, and not written to extensively, it'll hold its data just fine for years on end. They have a limits of a couple of terabytes to endure to have written to them, and in my career I have only seen 1 or 2 that gave up on me because they had seen bits written to one time too many, that's about 5% of the USB flash-media I've ever touched or worked with.
  10. Can't seem to be able to remove a drive from the pool, it keeps coming up with files that are assumed to be 'potentially unwanted software' (which they are not, they are just suspicious executables because they do things on lower levels, the usual Windows Defender false positives crap). An example dialog Window is attached. Please tell me how to get this nonsensical issue resolved. I realize it's probably Windows 10 that's causing this. But since I have already disabled virus scanning, and excluded the pooled drive for Win Defender, it is extra strange it's still trying to avoid moving it
  11. That can go two ways: Say you make auto backups every hour, so the backup can potentially be 59 minutes old if you've got a bad day ;-) You're working on something, you save the last bit of work, you work on it some more, then a disk stops working. Phew, you still have the other disk in the pool, where it did write your last work to. A backup would be useless, because it misses all that last work. Plus, restoring from the pool dir on that disk in the pool is a LOT easier than from any backup solution, most likely.
  12. Have you considered it may not be the flash-drive that's causing this? Try the USB controller or the motherboard. Especially check if the board gets enough power. I've seen USB drives unjustifiably getting the blame for issues more often than I can count, while a mainboard was broken, or PSU didn't have enough power left for the USB lanes. If that's ruled out, and it still fails, try running SpinRite level 2 scan on the USB-drive (or similar software). May work wonders.
  13. Umfriend and amateurphotographer, I don't know what your ages are, but I'm 52 and been using computers to store data for about 36 years now, and let me just throw this in here; The times when I 'accidentally' deleted a file or files and lost them that way can be counted on one hand. Especially since we have the RECYCLE BIN or Trash can that problem has disappeared for me, if I even ever accidentally do hit delete (in TotalCommander or DxO Photolab or some other program) and confirm its deletion, because the confirmation is still not automatic for me. So, I don't know about you guys, but t
  14. Dear true humans at Covecube, I have a stringent question that has been haunting me for weeks now: I currently have 11 physical HDD/SSD media that are all part of just ONE pool (and hence represented by one drive-letter..). Assuming I have lots of RAM free, and lots of CPU cores doing very little; Does this setup make sense, performance-wise, or is it faster or otherwise smarter to create more than one pool, say, for different directories or using different policies? I have a lot of placement rules active on this one pool, and lots of levels of multiplication set for diffe
  • Create New...