Jump to content
Covecube Inc.
Grant

Not properly interpreting Kingston A400 SSD Smart data

Recommended Posts

Most of the important fields come up as unknown, so it's not able to determine how much life is left.

Model: Kingston SA400S37240G

Bitflock ID: 4FUVYYWO

Drive datasheet: https://www.kingston.com/datasheets/SA400S37_us.pdf

 

Was recently added to smartmontools if the info there helps you at all: https://www.smartmontools.org/ticket/801

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, glad I asked you to add it ...it must have refreshed on its own since I just got an email that disk has 1% life left.  Kinda wish I hadn't installed the OS on it now.

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait...are we sure that's right?

 

It says 1% life left. But also says life time writes is only 391GB, average erase count 2 and max erase count 5. And power on time only 11 days

 Either some of those numbers are off, or this is an even crappier SSD than I thought it was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm seeing the same issue, I woke up to a 1% life left notification (total writes of ~4.16TB) that sent me into a panic before I realized it was a garbage warning.

Model: Kingston SA400S37480G

Bitflock ID: L7QLBP10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I think I see what's happening here.

I had a brand new fresh out of the package drive of the same model to test - on the brand new drive, it seems to interpret everything properly - it matches what CrystalDiskInfo and Kingston's own SSD Toolkit show.

But on my older drive, it where it says 1% life left, it's wrong.

Kingston's SSD Manager shows SSD Wear Indicator at 100% for the brand new drive, and 99% for the older one.

CrystalDiskInfo shows a raw hex value for attribute E7 of 64 for the new drive, 63 for the old drive - that's equivelent to 100 and 99 in decimal. But CrystalDiskInfo shows the current value as 100 for the new disk and 1 for the old disk.  Attached is a screenshot of all 3 programs.

 

I think both Stablebit Scanner and CrystalDiskInfo are interpreting the value wrong.  It looks like the raw value is the actually % life left, starting at 100 and counting down, not the normalized way many SMART values are interpreted.

Kingston's SSD Manager interprets the value correctly.

 

screenshot.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×