Jump to content

Christopher (Drashna)

Administrators
  • Posts

    11568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    366

Posts posted by Christopher (Drashna)

  1. Also, the system Event Viewer can give you an indication for why it failed.  In fact, with support tickets, it's one of my first go-tos for troubleshooting weird issues.   If you're seeing a lot of disk errors or the like in the event viewer, it can indicate an issue. 

    Also, the burst test in StableBit Scanner can help identify communication issues with the drive. 

  2. That is  the pool drive.   The 2048GB size exactly, that is the giveaway, and the "COVECUBECoveFsDisk_____" is just confirmation of that.   (that's the driver name).

    I'm not sure why that happened, but uninstalling and reinstalling StableBit DrivePool can also fix this. 

    And the drive is always reported as that size, in that section of Disk Management.  But elsewhere it shows the correct size. 

  3. That's a hard question to answer.  SSDs tend to be fast, including in how they fail.  But given this, I suspect that you might have some time.  However, back up the drive, for sure!  Even if you can't restore/clone the drive, you'd be able to recover settings and such from it. But ideally, you could restore from it. 

    And cloning the drive should be fine.  Most everything is SSD aware anymore, so shouldn't be an issue.   But also, sometimes a clean install is nice. 

  4. Would you mind opening a ticket about this?  
    https://stablebit.com/contact/

    This is definitely diving into the more technical aspects of the software, and I'm not as comfortable with how well I understand it, and would prefer to point Alex, the developer, to this discussion directly.  

    However, I think that some of the "twice" is part of the upload verification process, which can be changed/disabled.   Also, the file system has duplicate blocks enabled for the storage, for extra redundancy in case of provider issues (*cough* google drive *cough*).  But it also sounds like this may not be related to that.  

  5. Make sure that you're on the latest release version.  There are some changes to better handle when the provider is read only (should be at least version 1.2.5.1670).

    As for the empty chunks, there isn't really a way to discern that, unfortunately.  

    If you have the space, the best bet is to download the entire directory from Google Drive, and convert the data/drive, and then move the data out.  

  6. That's very odd.   I'm guessing it's something to do with the API that they're using, as I have a number of games installed to the pool, and don't experience any sort of issue like this. 

     

    That said, if you could get logging of this, it would go a long way. 
    https://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_DrivePool_2.x_Log_Collection

    Eg, enable logging, reproduce the issue, then exit and stop the logging as soon as it occurs.   And note the exact time, if possible. 

    Then open a ticket at https://stablebit.com/Contact and report/repost it there. 

  7. 5 hours ago, thestillwind said:

    Will you let the option available to people that want to use it with the risk associated or you will remove it from the list of choice ?

    FAQ answers that, as did I, above.  You can generate your own app API keys and use those, these are configured in "C:\ProgramData\StableBit CloudDrive\ProviderSettings.json" file. 

    The Google Drive Provider will be marked as "expirmental"/"deprecated".  This means that new installations, the provider will be hidden by default.  You can enable it by enabling experimental providers.   However, if you already have connected to Google Drive on a system, then it will stay visible. 

    19 hours ago, The Tran said:

    Where can I find instructions to get my own API Key to use?

    Fully outlined here: 
    https://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_CloudDrive_Q7941147

  8. StableBit DrivePool shouldn't move files from a non-poolpart folder into a poolpart folder.   So that part sounds odd, and possibly that Windows re-assigned drive letters? 

    And yes, the balancing does move the files from one PoolPart folder to another, on a different disk, if/when needed. 

    As for stopping the files from being moved, a good question here is "why are they being moved".  Most of the default balancers deal with edge cases, and shouldn't move data by default.  

    That said, could you open a ticket at https://stablebit.com/contact

  9. For the MSR partiation, this depends if the drive is MBR or GPT, and sometimes, how it was initialized+partitioned.  Either way, the presence/lack shouldn't effect things.  My pool has a mix of these, and has for a long while. 

    As for the non-GPT drive, it's possible that there was some partitioning error?  Eg, if the system was unstable and rebooting/BSODing, any time that the disk is being written to, there is a chance of corruption/damage. 

    22 hours ago, fleggett1 said:

    "Disk 9 has the same disk identifiers as one or more disks connected to the system. Go to Microsoft's support website (http://support.microsoft.com) and search for KB2983588 to resolve the issue."

    You can use diskpart or powershell to fix this. IIRC.  But it shouldn't be too big of an issue.  And if you're using Windows Server, the Multipath I/O feature can "fix" this. 

    Also, I would recommend checking the event viewer for disk, file system and controller errors.  They may point to a specific disk. 

    But Also, if you haven't, run a CHKDSK pass on *all* of the disks (except to pool)

     

  10. because it got bumped... I decided to look into defrag stuff again.... 

    • Diskeeper is now DymaxIO, with no real options or UI, and a yearly license.
    • Raxco PerfectDisk appears abandoned. 2021 is the latest update, and the website has some pretty critical errors on it. Windows 10 support mentioned, but nothing about Windows 11.  Edit:  They're actually closing, after operating for 45 years. :(
    • Defraggler is discontinued, last version is from 2018.
    • Auslogic Disk Defrag is super spammy.
    • O&O defrag, exists but haven't really tested it.  Server version is separate and much more expensive.

     

    Seems like the era of defragging is dead.  But given SSDs/NVMe drives, and large capacity HDDs,  I can't say that I'm surprsised.

×
×
  • Create New...