Jump to content
Covecube Inc.

ikon

Members
  • Content Count

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by ikon

  1. I get around the data loss problem by having multiple backup drive sets. I have 4 to 5 complete copies of all my data, depending on whether my current off-site drive set is fully caught up.
  2. Just an FYI, in case anyone is not aware: my father taught me long ago not to put things on HDDs and then forget about them, expecting the data to remain intact 'forever'. He told me magnetic media change over long periods of time (i.e. years): the bits 'drift' and weaken, and that can lead to unreadable data eventually. He said that, if the drives are in a system, I should run a utility like Scanner in the background that will periodically read the data (and re-write it if needed), to keep the recorded data intact and strong. For drives not in a system he said I should connect them to a syste
  3. Ah. I think I've got it now (takes me a while, often). OK, I will set it using the File Scan section. Thanks. UPDATE: just set "Mark all filesystems as unchecked" for the 2 drives that were indicating file system damage, and they're both now scanning their file system. Thanks again.
  4. I saw that, because of some earlier posts you made in this thread. What I'm asking is if setting All Checked Blocks as Unchecked to initiate a scan will cause the file system to be checked as well, so it can automatically set itself to Healthy.
  5. The way I've been forcing Scanner to scan a disk is to set All Checked Blocks as Unchecked. Will that do it?
  6. Just so I truly understand, you're saying that Scanner does not reset its status after initiating a CHKDSK scan and finding no file system issues?
  7. I'm now having this issue. My version is 2.5.2.3129 Beta. CHKDSK /f x: has 3 times reported no problems with 2 drives, but Scanner continues to report file system damage on both, even after setting CHKDSK to Verbose. I have run the troubleshooter to upload the relevant data files. Oh, and I tried to run chkdsk /r \\?\Volume{c36115c7-9b09-4dcc-a6eb-e00483938a84} but it said the volume cannot be opened for direct access. Oops. I just ran CHKDSK again on one of the drives and it said there were orphaned files that it recovered. I'm rescanning that drive now. On the other drive, however
  8. I think Drashna was saying to try your existing key on the new install. Since it's installing on the same hardware, it may work. without having to deactivate. If it doesn't work, then email.
  9. Here's a detailed view of the Scanner blocking:
  10. When I swapped my off site drive sets today, I did a screen capture of the USB Safely Remove notification window that shows Scanner locking up the Lian-Li EX-503 USB external enclosure: Dang: I just realised I should have clicked on the + sign next to Scanner.Service.exe. If you would like me to do that, let me know. Dang 2: I just tried to get a capture of the Scanner notification window again (so I could click the + sign) and it showed me that DrivePool was locking up the enclosure. I presume DP is measuring the pool that's on the drives in the enclosure.
  11. On the server, at least, it doesn't seem to have made any difference. I still have to stop the Scanner service. I'm still running the USB Safe Removal program on the server, and it still says the Scanner service is blocking the ejection of my OffSite drive enclosure.
  12. Maybe this explains why I've never seen this issue on USB drives: they're pretty much all formatted GPT. These days, I basically don't bother with MBR.
  13. My bad. I should have mentioned that I had figured the 'auto move' option would detect and exclude, with a warning presumably, the system boot drive; something like, "the boot drive cannot be added to a Drive Pool". I know some 'other' drive pooling software programs do automatically relocate files.
  14. OK, I've done it on the server. I'll do the same on my main desktop later.
  15. Just a quick update to say that, on my Windows 10 server, I had to stop the scanner service today in order to physically remove a drive that I had removed from the pool using DrivePool. It seems pretty consistent on the server. I may have to spring for a copy of Easy USB Remover in order to keep track of whether Scanner has a drive or enclosure locked up.
  16. I have been wondering why DrivePool doesn't offer an option to move the files for you; perhaps a checkbox that says, "please move all non-pooled files into the pool on newly added drives". That way, DrivePool could take whatever steps are necessary, such as temporarily halting duplication on the newly added drives, to ensure the movement of the files is handled correctly.
  17. I have run into the "not all USB flash drives are equal" issue. I was trying to make a USB drive bootable some years ago, and it wasn't working, no matter what I did, and despite my following the instructions I read online in several different places. Finally, I called my father, and he explained about different flash drives behaving differently. He told me about a make/model of one that worked for him. I went and bought one, and it did work. From then on, I've been kinda careful about flash drives. I didn't think that applied to drive locking however, so good to know.
  18. Hmmm, not sure what procman or systernals is/are, but I did find a little program called USB Safely Remove. It's kind of neat. After I installed it, I tried to eject a USB drive and it came up with a window that listed 3 items: a Service Host entry, then Stablebit Scanner, then another Service Host. That's when I decided to stop Scanner, and the ejection worked. I wanted to show you an image of the USB Safely Remove window. I had uninstalled it after figuring out I could stop Scanner to eject, and realizing that, as long as Scanner had the USB drive locked up, Safely Remove wasn't going t
  19. Se same. I opened the flash drive with Explorer, then opened a photo on the drive. Then I closed the photo, closed Explorer, waited a couple of minutes, then tried to eject --> no go. As soon as I ran net stop "stablebit scanner service" I was able to eject the drive. Here's a SnipTool of Scanner with the flash drive connected: And here's a SnipTool of Scanner's Advanced Settings page to show the version number:
  20. Just checked: v2.5.2.3124 BETA. Going to install 3129 now and test.
  21. I'm pretty sure they are. The mother board is pretty old now (2011 I think: it's either an Asus P8P67-M or a P8H67-M Pro), so there haven't been any updates for a few years. I guess I will just have to live with stopping & starting Scanner. The good news is I found a couple of example shortcuts my father created, so I've been able to create an easy way to stop & start the service: cmd.exe /c net stop "stablebit scanner service" and cmd.exe /c net start "stablebit scanner service" I set both of them to run as Administrator and they work really well. Thanks Dad
  22. @Spider99 Thanks for the response. Unfortunately, this doesn't work for me. At first I thought it might be a problem in that I was plugging the USB flash drive into a USB hub (USB2) but it made no difference when I plugged it into a USB3 port on the front of the computer. Also, I'm embarrassed to admit I totally missed that page when looking for possibilities. How? I have no idea. It's not like it's hidden or anything. Anyway, I still have to stop the Scanner service, eject, and then restart the service. I noticed that, in your image, you show both items in the Removable Drives section as
  23. I've had an issue when using USB flash drives. Most of the time, Windows says I can't eject the drive because it's in use. I struggled for several days trying to figure out exactly what was tying up the flash drive. Finally, I thought that, perhaps, Scanner was involved. So, I located the Stablebit Scanner Service using services.msc, stopped it, and was able to eject the drive. So, OK, problem found, I guess. Anyway, stopping and starting Stablebit Scanner Service is not a very satisfying way to eject flash drives, so I figured, maybe, Scanner can be configured to ignore such drives. I ha
  24. Sorry, I still don't get it. How can I connect 4 eSATA cables to an enclosure that only has one receptacle? Am I just supposed to use one and ignore the rest?
  25. I'm don't understand how that would work. My two Lian-Li enclosures only have a single eSATA port each. What you described does sound a lot like the cable that I was using on my 3ware RAID card though.
×
×
  • Create New...