Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/01/18 in all areas

  1. Makes sense - it would make the SSD cache drive more like a traditional cache, instead of simply a hot landing zone pool member which is offloaded over time. +1
    1 point
  2. Pretty please? Just to reiterate my use case: My media server has quite a few users. As new media comes in, it's likely to have a lot of viewers and therefore a lot of I/O. As files get older, fewer and fewer people access them. So I'd love to have an SSD landing zone for all new files, which then get archived off to platters as space requires. It would be fantastic if I could say, once the SSD drive(s) reaches 80% full, archive files down to 50% using FIFO.
    1 point
  3. 1 point
×
×
  • Create New...