I am curious about how the SSD Optimizer distributes data. I was expecting it to be a little more evenly spread across my disks, but it seems like 1 disk in particular gets a lot, although everyone is getting some data. I'm just eyeballing this, but the one that is obviously more full looks to be in the 80% range, while 5 others are around 50-60, and 3 are around 30%. The disks are not uniform in size, but I don't feel like that would account for the relative % changes, because the smaller disks(2TB) are also showing the least full.
I currently have only the SSD Optimizer and Scanner plugs enabled. Perhaps I'm expecting too much, if I want a more even distribution, should I re-enable Volume Equalization? I was under the impression enabling any other balancer would interfere with the SSD optimizer, or not produce any benefit..
Question
JasonC
I am curious about how the SSD Optimizer distributes data. I was expecting it to be a little more evenly spread across my disks, but it seems like 1 disk in particular gets a lot, although everyone is getting some data. I'm just eyeballing this, but the one that is obviously more full looks to be in the 80% range, while 5 others are around 50-60, and 3 are around 30%. The disks are not uniform in size, but I don't feel like that would account for the relative % changes, because the smaller disks(2TB) are also showing the least full.
I currently have only the SSD Optimizer and Scanner plugs enabled. Perhaps I'm expecting too much, if I want a more even distribution, should I re-enable Volume Equalization? I was under the impression enabling any other balancer would interfere with the SSD optimizer, or not produce any benefit..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.