Jump to content

Christopher (Drashna)

Administrators
  • Posts

    11573
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    366

Posts posted by Christopher (Drashna)

  1. Technogod, 

     

    That may work, but I'm not sure.

    What I do know WILL work is if you click on the "+" nex to a drive, and click on the circle arrow box, you can "mark as good" and skip the check for the time being (until the next pass is due).

    But I can definitely see this being tedious, for all 12 drives. Hmm, maybe a "mark all" button would be a good idea for cases like the one you mention.

  2. Ah, Asmedia, .... yeah, I've heard them mentioned before, with, I'm sure you can guess it, not good reviews. Both here, and at We Got Served. From everything I've seen, it sounds like their drivers are not really stable. 

     

    And that would account for why I was having no issues. I'm using onboard USB3 which is using AMD's chipset.

     

     

    Hopefully you don't have any other issues, and Scanner stays working. However, if you don't have one already, I'd recommend making a backup of it in it's working state. Just to make sure.

  3. I think "RAW" is the wrong term here, or at least misleading.  I beleive he means disk passthrough. That the whole disk is being passed through, it it's "raw state", basically.

     

     

    If you want SMART data in the VM, ESXi is the way to go. the ESX RDM passthrough does pass along the SMART data for the drive.

     

    HyperV does not pass along this data (I don't know why Microsoft doesn't.... it's actually kind of frustrating).  So if you want to grab SMART data as well, you'd need to install Scanner on the Host OS, and disable the file checks for the passed through disks.  The plus side is that there is $9.95 discount for additional licenses, and you can monitor the host OS's drive as well. Something you can't do with ESXi, as it's *NIX based, and we're a "Windows Outfit".

  4. I know but it requieres an USB key... A bit useless for a server. Always plugged in then and so I can turn encryption off... which would be the same since a thief would have the USB key. Otherwise you won't be able to remote-start the server (if the usb key isn't attached) which is also bad since this is a Server not a workstation...

    That last bit is definitely a legitimate concern.

     

    But that's only if you want to automatically unlock the rest of the drives. If  you don't mind manually connecting into the server and unlocking the drives manually after every reboot.. but that's just a hassle.

     

     

    And Alex has said, he is working on implementing it. 

    But we definitely understand if you don't want to wait. But we hope you come back once we've got TrueCrypt support added.

  5. The dashboard looks for the specific user's access. Like for example, if you had a user "Mick", it would look for that account and it's privileges on the "share" in "Server Folder". You can verify that yourself, by checking the permissions (on lets say "Videos"). It will have "SYSTEM", "Administrators" and "Mick" listed for the users. If it doesn't have "Mick", then the dashboard would report "No Access". And if it has read access, well, "Read Only", and so on.

     

    As for making sure use access works 100% as expected. Delete the "users" and "Authenticated Users" on each share. Or do it to "ServerFolders" and "replace child entries". Just note, that until you add the specifically defined entries for each folder, you may not be able to access the files locally.

     

    Sorry if all of this is confusing... but NTFS security permissions *are* confusing and if you don't thoroughly understand them, it can be even more so. 

    And as I said, the tool is meant to leave the pool in a 100% workable state (same permissions as if your formated, BTW). 

  6. That I can understand, but the surface scan is DEFINITELY read only. All it does is to make sure each sector is readable. If it detects any issues, it flags it for followup/repair/action, and lets you know. It doesn't write to it at all.

     

    As for chkdsk, unless you use /scan (windows 8) or /f (fix), it should never write either.

     

    But I'm sure there are utilities that do write as part of their testing. Scanner is not one of them.

  7. Yup. I have two Seagate Backup Plus drives (USB3). Both connected, and True Image runs just fine, and is quite snappy.

    I don't have any other external enclosures, but can see about getting one, to see if that's the issue.

     

    If i had to guess, the issue may actually be your USB3 drivers. Since it's still pretty new, there have been a good number of people that have reported issues with them or their systems in general when using USB3.

     

    But I hate pointing fingers (even when it is somebody else's fault/issue). Which is why I asked for those dumps. That way we can be certain about where the issue lies.

    And you said the issue doesn't happen if Scanner is stopped. That would indicate a problem with Scanner, or with how it's querying data (it could be causing issues with the driver which could cause the instability.)

     

    And have you tried unplugging each of the enclosures to see if that isn't the cause as well?

  8. Mick, that's the one service that *shouldn't* be running, except for at startup. And then it ends. So, that's all good from a service standpoint.

     

     

    And okay, I just wanted to make sure that it was rebooted. 

    There is one more place to look for logs here... and I'm not entirely sure they'll be helpful though.

     

    On the server, head to "C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows Server\Logs", and zip up all of the longs there. Then PM me the zipped logs. Please don't post them here, as there can be somewhat sensitive data there. If the logs are too large to attach, then just upload them to a cloud storage location, and PM a link to them.

  9. Well, since I'm assuming you're restarted the server like it recommends....

    Run "services.msc" on the server, and check to see if any of the "Windows Server" services are not running (there should be a couple that aren't).

    Please list any that aren'.

     

    Also, have you checked the event viewer on the server for any errors related to users or WHS?

     

     

    Additionally, you can change things manually.

    Specifically, just add the user to the NTFS Permissions on the file.

     

    And as for the ntfs permission state, you are correct. But the settings used are to guarantee that the files are 100% accessible and that nothing should prevent you from accessing the files. After they've been put into this state, you change them as you see fit. But DO NOT mess with the SYSTEM account settings, as this is the account that DrivePool uses (for grabbing info, duplication and balancing). The "Users" and "Authenticated Users" entries can be deleted, if you wish.

  10. Technogod, I can't seem to replicate the issue on my system. Either in a VM or on physical machines.

     

    Since this is the case, would you mind getting a couple of memory dumps?

    http://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_Scanner_Freeze

     

    But preferably this:

    http://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_DrivePool_System_Freeze

    This involves forcing a BSOD to dump the memory. But if you can duplicate the issue and do this, we can take a good look at what's going on.

  11. Ah, the drive being USB and not in the pool makes it a bit more complicated. 

     

    But yes, moving it yourself is faster, IMO. Especially if you are using something like TeraCopy.

     

    Also, you could just copy the database, and then use regedit to just change the location that is being used (instead of using the dashboard to move it)

    This is more complicated, and definitely more on the "advanced" side, but it would make it much easier to test out if it's working, and no have to risk your data.

     

     

    And if you do this, please enable tracing logs, so that if/when it errors out, we can see if DrivePool is the cause of this (or where the cause may be).

  12. It should be enough to just added the Pool itself. But if you do wish to add the pool parts as well, there is no harm in that. (well, other than a larger search database, and memory usage when it indexes files, but aside from that.... :) )

×
×
  • Create New...