Jump to content
Covecube Inc.

Metasyntactic

Members
  • Content Count

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. FWIW, i would very much like this. Indeed, this is the one thing keeping me off of DrivePool. I would happily move to drivepool and even pay extra for such a feature. My use case is similar to Phidaissi's. I often download torrents, but then use hardlinks to 'virtually move' them to a new location with a different name. In my scenario, both the torrent location and the final destination location would be in the same pool. So this constraint would be satisfied: > But keep in mind that if we do implement something like this, we'd probably ONLY move hardlinked files in the pool,
×
×
  • Create New...