Jump to content
Covecube Inc.

Pichu0102

Members
  • Content Count

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. That would work, but unfortunately, just wouldn't work for me. Lots of smaller drives of various sizes. So the hunt for a compatible backup program continues.
  2. Hello. I was wondering what my options are for backup programs out there that can backup files and folders from a pool drive directly without having to back up each individual drive in the pool (which would lead to an annoying amount of wasted space due to 3x duplication on the pool). I keep trying different ones, but either I run into ones that require VSS, or have their own set of issues, like Duplicati. I used to use Crashplan, but decided to move on. I'm now using Backblaze for online backup, but still need one for local backup. Any suggestions?
  3. Mm, it's more the cloud drives are a stopgap until I get a new local drive to replace an older one here, but yeah. My pool has been running with 3x duplication over 3 internal and 7 external drives, so adding cloud drives is just a way to give a spare amount of space to work with, as I put the cloud pool to not allow duplicated or unduplicated files unless the other drives were all 90% full. Also have Crashplan backup everything both locally (to the 3x duplicated pool itself, forbidden from using the cloud drives to store backup files, bad practice, but local backup is more for files I need to
  4. I ended up testing my idea before seeing your post, sorry. I simulated failure by moving test files out of FTP Drive A's poolpart folder to the root. Drivepool only reacted once I chose to recheck duplication, and only realized the problem when it checked Pool A, not when it checked Cloud Pool A. It then reduplicated back to FTP Drive A. I was thinking about it in the wrong direction. Cloud Pool A isn't concerned about duplication or missing duplicates, as it is not duplicated, but Pool A was concerned and safely regenerated into Cloud Pool A, which put the files in FTP Drive A again. So
  5. If I were to create a pool that consisted of multiple local drives, and one cloud pool with cloud drives, if a drive is lost from the cloud pool, would the cloud pool be able to regenerate from the pool above? An example: Pool A (3x duplication) Local Drive A Local Drive B Local Drive C Local Drive D Local Drive E Cloud Pool A (no duplication) FTP Drive A B2 Drive A Google Drive Drive A If one of the drives under Cloud Pool A goes kaput: Pool A (3x duplication) Local Drive A Local Drive B Local Drive C Local Drive D Local Drive E Cloud Pool A (no
  6. I'm getting an error using the File Share provider on Windows 10. In addition to regularly forgetting the file share password, it also has this cryptic message randomly and fails to make a new drive: CloudDrive.Service.exe Warning 0 [IoManager:23] Error performing I/O operation on provider. Retrying. Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service 2016-04-30 09:15:57Z 603868056 CloudDrive.Service.exe Warning 0 [IoManager:23] Error performing I/O operation on provider. Retrying. Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service 2016-04-30 09:15:57Z 60
  7. Hello, I was wondering, is it safe to write directly to a Poolpart folder? Nvidia Shadowplay demands high write speeds or it fails miserably, and the pool has some slow writing drives with the entire thing at 3x. However, I have an internal drive fast enough to write videos out. Is it safe to point it at the folder I want it to be in on the pool in the Poolpart folder, and let Drivepool eventually pick it up and duplicate it and move it around once it gets around to it?
  8. I was wondering, when Scanner triggers an evacuation of files, for files already duplicated elsewhere on the pool, does it pull and duplicate copies from healthy drives, or from the unhealthy drive?
  9. Still nothing on the 0748, even with NoWMI checked, NoWMI and Unsafe checked, and only Unsafe checked. DirectIO test program unsafe returns SMART values on the 0748 though. Smart attributes for device: 8 Version: 16 Offline data collection status: NeverStartted Self-test execution status: PreviousCompletedNoErorrOrNoTestRun Self-test percent remaining: 0 To complete off-line data collection: 03:05:00 Off-line data collection capability: ExecuteOffLineImmediate, Vendor1, OffLineReadScanning, SelfTest, ConveyanceSelfTest, SelectiveSelfTest SMART capability: Smar
  10. Nope, not even with DirectIO Unsafe checked, either.
  11. ID: USRYRN9X Also, bad sectors popped up on all disk scans while on the Beta you linked.
  12. Nope, still not getting smart data from that drive in Scanner. Edit: And I had to downgrade to the official release because the Beta decided all my drives had random bad sectors. Not good.
  13. Here's what it says: Smart attributes for device: 6 Version: 16 Offline data collection status: NeverStartted Self-test execution status: PreviousCompletedNoErorrOrNoTestRun Self-test percent remaining: 0 To complete off-line data collection: 03:05:00 Off-line data collection capability: ExecuteOffLineImmediate, Vendor1, OffLineReadScanning, SelfTest, ConveyanceSelfTest, SelectiveSelfTest SMART capability: SmartAutoSaveOnPowerModeSwitch, SmartEnableDisableAndAttributeAutosaveSupported Error logging capability: True Short self-test polling time: 00:02:0
×
×
  • Create New...