GaPony

All my drives are installed inside the server chassis, so I'll just remove the HBAs which will have the same effect. Reading back through many, many old posts on the subject, I believe I've been looking at this all wrong. The actual information Drivepool uses to build and maintain the pool is stored on the pooled drives, not on the system disk, so its just a matter of reinstalling Drivepool and it goes looking for the poolpart folders on the physical drives in order to rebuild the pool. I'm not sure why I've been thinking I needed to worry about what was on the C: Drive, other than that's where I placed the junctions for the drives on my system, but that seems to be more of a housekeeping feature to get around the 26 drive letter limit more than anything to do with Drivepool itself. If this is correct, I believe I'm ready to go.
It would seem that Stablebit Drivepool is quite a feat of engineering.
 
Thanks again Shane.

All my drives are installed inside the server chassis, so I'll just remove the HBAs which will have the same effect. Reading back through many, many old posts on the subject, I believe I've been looking at this all wrong. The actual information Drivepool uses to build and maintain the pool is stored on the pooled drives, not on the system disk, so its just a matter of reinstalling Drivepool and it goes looking for the poolpart folders on the physical drives in order to rebuild the pool. I'm not sure why I've been thinking I needed to worry about what was on the C: Drive, other than that's where I placed the junctions for the drives on my system, but that seems to be more of a housekeeping feature to get around the 26 drive letter limit more than anything to do with Drivepool itself. If this is correct, I believe I'm ready to go.
It would seem that Stablebit Drivepool is quite a feat of engineering.
 
Thanks again Shane.

Whatever you all do, don't wait 3 years and 8,000 movies (taking up 50TB), later to decide duplication would be a good idea. When I noticed my pool was getting full, it finally dawned on me I'd have a miserable time replacing lost movies if even one of the 15 WD40EFRX 4TB drives went south. Not only did it blast a hole in my wallet this week, to fill the remainder of my RPC-4224 case with 8x new WD80EFAX 8TB and 1x new WD100EFAX 10TB drive (experimental), it appears it will take a month of Sundays to get the job done. I probably doesn't help than I'm doing this on an old WHS2011 machine with 3x AOC-SASLP2-MV8 controllers, one of which is running in a 4x slot. I just hope I don't kill something in the process. I honestly didn't think the 10TB drive would work. I had it initialize, partition and format it on a newer PC for some reason. So I'm still not 100% sure how reliable its going to be.
After 4 hours, it actually looks like its copying about 500GB per hour. So maybe it won't a full month of Sundays...