Jump to content
  • 0

Kinda Late to the Party


Lioninstreet

Question

As noted, I'm not an early adopter....

I'm setting up a "new" HP ex490 build using WHS11, fully updated using WSUS/WHS11. Storage is with four 1.92 tb SSD'd, all are now formatted and seen by the OS console. 

Starting with a noob question:  When setting up SBDP v2.2.5, is the SSD add in required or optional?

What functionality does it add?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If I understand you correctly, you want to know what advantage adding an SSD to DrivePool v2.2.5 would add to your setup.

In your case, since all your pool drives are already SSDs, I don't think you would see any advantage to designating an SSD as a front end cache because all of your SSD drives probably have about the same read/write speed.

In my setup, I have 19 USB 3.0 HDDs as Archive Drives (much cheaper, but also much slower, than SSDs) and then I added a single ~250GB SSD as my front end cache for DrivePool. When I write a file to DrivePool, it first goes to my SSD (very fast) and latter when DrivePool "rebalances" it moves the files off the SSD to the much slower Archive USB 3.0 HDDs in the background. In my case, the SSD front end cache significantly sped up my DrivePool writes. If the file(s) is still in the SSD cache when I read it, it will also speed up the read process. However, by the time I want to read any of my files in DrivePool, they are almost always flushed to the Archive drives by then so my read speeds are limited by the transfer rate of my USB 3.0 HDDs. I use my DrivePool primarily as a home media storage server, so the speed of my read rates are not critical. The SSD front end cache allows to me quickly transfer files to DrivePool and then move on to some other tasks.

If, at some point, you decided to add non-SSDs to your DrivePool as Archive drives - to save money, maybe - then you would see an advantage to designating one or more of your SSDs as a front end cache for DrivePool. That way, if you write a file to DrivePool, it will always go to the SDD front end cache first at SSD speed. If not, DrivePool will attempt to balance the pool drives and maybe write directly to your Archive drive(s) at their non-SSD rated speed - which would be much slower than your SSD drives. I only mention this because my DrivePool storage continued to expand beyond my initial setup and I bought non-SSDs to save money.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...