Jump to content

gokuz

Members
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gokuz

  1. well, if you read my previous posts, i did comment on having already sending a ticket to my problem, no response either. maybe coz its the holidays but come on, a potential paid service should have fast replies even during holidays.

     

    i have a question, have you even tried rclone, your competition? your response says a clear no. as rclone is able to encrypt both the files and filenames.

     

    so, anything thats encrypted will be a jumbled mess without any extensions whatsoever.

    i.e tvshow.mkv > hydgvd76473jfifhhfrj

     

    i get that block might be much more secure, but at what cost? the speed difference is night and day.

     

    having 80/40 for stablebit

     

    800/400 for rclone.

     

    i just want to share what i learnt so unless you get it up and running to get 800/400, I don't see the real benefit in using your product at all. its just how the way it is.

  2. the support you mentioned here is 4 days late. which is counter intuitive.

     

    rather than telling me what i already know. why not explain what's the difference between block based and file based? and the pros and cons

     

    the reason i came to stablebit is:

    1) save my files in the cloud

    2) it needs to be encrypted as sending unencrypted stuff online is a disaster

     

    I'm sure its the same for most people. note keyword: FILES

     

    so why not help others find a better way than your product that has 4 days superb support delay which is much faster than community support mind you. lol

  3. Rclone has a very different use case. It's only for backing up and encrypting data to the cloud. You can't stream encrypted content from the drive without downloading the whole file like you can with Stablebit. If storing encrypted data in the cloud without touching it for a while is what you are looking for, then Rclone would be a better program for you.

    i suggest to everyone that wants stablebit to work as intended to change to rclone. the reasons are as follows:

    1) its encrypyed

    2) super fast dl/ul getting 800/400mbps stable

    3) you can definitely mount and share it thru samba (linux mount>windows), making it a freaking network drive just like you would stablebit.

    4) you can even download from said network drive

    5) and of course it doesn't download while streaming, which is also SMOOTH AF

  4. I updated to 783 and its been working quite well now. You want to change your prefetch to 100 MB or 400 MB at least. Again if you are having issues with download i recommend reauthorizing your account as well, because of the API pool issue.

    What speeds are you getting?

     

    I have no choice but to not use your product if this goes on. No support to resolve my issue. Has sent a ticket 2 days ago = no replies. Post forum = no replies.

     

    TBH this is a dead service.

  5. I'm having speeds up to 100MB/s = 800Mb/s, speeds direct download from google drive from pure transferring, no encryption. This essentially maxes out my internet plan which is 1Gbps.

     

    Proof = http://imgur.com/a/lqm2y

     

     

    But when i try to download through stablebit i get this shitty speeds of 2MB/s = 16Mb/s, shown here, http://imgur.com/a/Lu61B.

     

    I'm still on trial to test this out. I really want this to work and would like to purchase your product. Please help me fix this.

     

    These are my settings : http://imgur.com/a/TQM4F

     

    10TB drive, 10gb local cache, 20mb chunk.

     

    I see a lot of success stories which made me try this in the first place. Do help me fix this problem.

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...