I saw that this was requested as early as 4 years ago and im not sure if it ever got traction. As you would expect I'm asking this question coming from a place of media storage. I intend on having SnapRaid underneath DrivePool to handle my fault tolerance, but Im looking to place files intelligently to minimally spin up drives when files are accessed.
This is accomplished with MergerFS in linux by specifying epmfs as the default policy (of all drives where the path exists, choose drive with most available free space).
Drive1: A:\Media\Movies\TheFirstMovie (2020)\
Drive2: B:\Media\Movies
If I wrote a metadata file (poster, srt subtitles, etc) belonging to TheFirstMovie (2020), it would write it to Drive 1. This is ideal for serving media as like-files are similarly requested. If I wrote a new movie TheSecondMovie (2021), since both Drive1 and Drive2 have the path \Media\Movies, it will choose the drive with the most free space (lets say its Drive2), creating B:\Media\Movies\TheSecondMovie (2021) on Drive2. This accomplishes balancing while minimizing the chances of spinning up the entire array of disks when a single media entry is accessed.
I've looked through the documentation and forums and couldn't quite get a clear answer on if this was possible in the current DrivePool version. I could see static / wildcarded pathing support for directing files to drives, but that's only a half solution as that would force us to track specific movies or tv series and make entries for them in the config. This logic seems easy to create in an automated fashion.
Is it possible?
I believe the default is to just throw a write error (out of space), but I imagine there's an alternative way to handle it. More here: https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs#policy-descriptions "If all branches are filtered an error will be returned. Typically EROFS (read-only filesystem) or ENOSPC (no space left on device) depending on the most recent reason for filtering a branch. ENOENT will be returned if no elegible branch is found." I may look into writing a balancer plugin if its possible with the current framework. Thanks for the response! I hope it does get implemented. If I were to use the current version of Drivepool, whats the closest I can get to spinning up the least amount of drives? Ordered File Placement filling up one drive at a time?