<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Nuts & Bolts Latest Topics]]></title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/forum/21-nuts-bolts/</link><description><![CDATA[Nuts & Bolts Latest Topics]]></description><language>en</language><item><title>File Duplication with regards to drive failures</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/31045-file-duplication-with-regards-to-drive-failures/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Greetings,
</p>

<p>
	I am new to Drivepool, after terrible repeat failures with MS storage spaces. I lost 20yrs of my Plex collection and I am slowly rebuilding
</p>

<p>
	I have 6 drives in my pool with main content on a drive within the pool.
</p>

<p>
	I have 3TB of data on 40TB total space.
</p>

<p>
	I have enabled 4x duplication as I have plenty of space, but per the manual I don't see where I can protect against multiple HD failures.
</p>

<p>
	In addition on the drive pool, it only says 352B are duplicated? Shouldn't it show 3TBx4 ?
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	-A-
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">31045</guid><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:11:43 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Question about StableBit Scanner/Cloud and LAN-only Machines</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/30372-question-about-stablebit-scannercloud-and-lan-only-machines/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<strong><span>Can StableBit Cloud monitor a LAN-only machine running StableBit Scanner by routing through another machine on the same LAN that also runs StableBit Scanner with internet access?</span></strong>
</p>

<p>
	<span>If </span><span>I </span><span>have </span><span>StableBit </span><span>Scanner </span><span>installed </span><span>on </span><span>two </span><span>machines </span><span>on </span><span>the </span><span>same </span><span>LAN</span>
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<p>
			<strong><span>Machine </span><span>A</span></strong><span> </span><span>has </span><span>internet </span><span>access</span>
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<strong><span>Machine </span><span>B</span></strong><span> </span><span>does </span><strong><span>not</span></strong><span> </span><span>have </span><span>internet </span><span>access</span>
		</p>
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	<span>can </span><span>StableBit </span><span>Cloud </span><span>still </span><span>monitor </span><span>the </span><span>status </span><span>of </span><span>Machine </span><span>B’s </span><span>drives </span><span>by </span><span>routing </span><span>through </span><span>Machine </span><span>A (</span><span>which </span><span>does </span><span>have </span><span>internet </span><span>and </span><span>is </span><span>running </span><span>StableBit </span><span>Scanner)?</span>
</p>

<p>
	<span>The </span><span>documentation </span><span>says:</span>
</p>

<blockquote>
	<ul>
		<li>
			<span>"</span><span>Easily </span><span>connect </span><span>to </span><span>any </span><span>other </span><span>copy </span><span>of </span><span>the </span><span>StableBit </span><span>Scanner </span><span>running </span><span>on </span><span>your </span><span>LAN.</span>
		</li>
		<li>
			<span>"</span><span>Use </span><span>the </span><span>StableBit </span><span>Cloud </span><span>to </span><span>manage </span><span>the </span><span>app </span><span>from </span><span>the </span><span>web."</span>
		</li>
	</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>
	<span>Just </span><span>trying </span><span>to </span><span>confirm </span><span>if </span><span>that </span><span>setup </span><span>allows Stablebit Cloud monitoring of Stablebit Scanner installations on </span><span>LAN only </span><span>devices </span><span>or </span><span>if </span><span>each </span><span>machine </span><span>needs </span><span>direct </span><span>outbound </span><span>access </span><span>to </span><span>the </span><span>internet.</span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">30372</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 20:55:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Scanner detected bad sectors. Need help understanding.</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/15525-scanner-detected-bad-sectors-need-help-understanding/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hopefully, the short version. I have used drive pool for 11 years. However, my attempt to recover and isolate a bad drive only resulted in the backup NAS being read only. Now, I am replacing NASs and using newer hardware. Want to use one of the 6TB HDDs. So, removed, cleared the partition and formatted. The installed Scanner and Drivepool. Scanner reports errors on the drive. In short, I am running chkdsk g: /f /r /x. Chkdsk is reporting the complete scan will take 13+ hours. Reading forum posts and the online manual, there is no indication that the drive will be usable. At this point there are no files to recover on the drive. Question is running chkdsk as a fix a waste of time?
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/BadBlockII.jpg.03e6adabe86a9a7fb0edcab01e06a3ab.jpg" data-fileid="2796" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Bad Block II.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="2796" data-ratio="36" width="1000" src="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/BadBlockII.thumb.jpg.19faec780973f22634606b16265fab8c.jpg" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">15525</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:54:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Scanning schedule questions</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/8118-scanning-schedule-questions/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I currently have 22 disks in my system, scanning every 30 days. However, because of the way Scanner runs, it does nothing for 28 days, then starts hammering all my disks in sequence for 2 days straight, every month. I can't figure out how to get my disks on a different schedule, so that every day, just 1 drive is hitting the scan schedule.
</p>

<p>
	During the 2-3 days that scanning occurs, I have system stability issues, and I think that by forcing my schedule to be less intense all at once every month, I can reduce/eliminate that stability issue.
</p>

<p>
	Is there a way to force a scan, even if one is not due yet, to reset the timer on that drive? Or, just to reset the timer on a drive without a scan?
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">8118</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 11:40:14 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Yellow Block</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/7654-yellow-block/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Tried looking for answers but can't seem to find it. What does the yellow block mean?
</p>

<p>
	Documentation only indicates gray, green, red, blue and purple. No yellow. 
</p>

<p>
	Scanner reports all good but DP does not recognize the drive.
</p>

<p>
	Ideas?
</p>

<p>
	Thanks
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a contenteditable="false" data-ipshover="" data-ipshover-target="https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/profile/6-christopher-drashna/&amp;do=hovercard" data-mentionid="6" href="https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/profile/6-christopher-drashna/" rel="">@Christopher (Drashna)</a>
</p>

<p><a href="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_2022_05/601288033_Screenshot2022-05-10082836.png.7f0a07c7704ffd0754b069d40282f9f1.png" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="2497" src="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_2022_05/1564039077_Screenshot2022-05-10082836.thumb.png.0646884608d3f25e970813c3e62a1a97.png" data-ratio="49.1" width="1000" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Screenshot 2022-05-10 082836.png"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_2022_05/475326674_Screenshot2022-05-10084052.png.586ac55a0b74975e78ae868263669b39.png" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="2498" src="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_2022_05/475326674_Screenshot2022-05-10084052.png.586ac55a0b74975e78ae868263669b39.png" data-ratio="82.34" width="674" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Screenshot 2022-05-10 084052.png"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">7654</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 12:43:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Questions regarding hard drive spindown/standby</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/48-questions-regarding-hard-drive-spindownstandby/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am trying to get a better understanding of the hard drive spindown/standby options in Scanner.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My situation:</p>
<ul><li>I'm using the latest Betas of Scanner and DrivePool on Windows Server 2012 Essentials.</li>
<li>I have two data disks which I've added to a single pool.</li>
<li>In the Windows power options I have set the hard drive standby time to 30 minutes.</li>
</ul><p>Here are my questions:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>When I right click a drive in the drive list there is an option called "Put into Standby". If I click this then I hear the drive spindown and the text in the Power column (you need to add this column by right-clicking headings) changes to "Standby or Active". This text will not change back to "Active" until I restart the service, regardless of whether the drive has spun up again. <strong>Is this a bug? Should this text reflect the standby status of the drive?</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>If I select a drive and click "Disk control" at the bottom of the screen I find a couple of settings that mention standby, in particular "Standby timer", which has a semi-selected (grey) checkbox. <strong>How do these settings relate to the Windows power settings? Do I need to alter them?</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>My end goal is to have my drives go into standby after 30 minutes idle time.</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">48</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:32:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>shouldnt i be seeing performance info here?</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/7118-shouldnt-i-be-seeing-performance-info-here/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	my performance tab is dead empty even though i certainly have activity going on.  Is this because theyre not internal drives and are connected via an HBA or something? 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="png" data-fileid="2462" href="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_2022_03/image.png.56ce23fdb1c78da29f1155fc6219a619.png" rel=""><img alt="image.thumb.png.2a9b0f54192dc3d53d1ab0dc89aa034b.png" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="2462" data-ratio="9.10" width="1000" src="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_2022_03/image.thumb.png.2a9b0f54192dc3d53d1ab0dc89aa034b.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="png" data-fileid="2461" href="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_2022_03/image.png.4c8dd09c0e15d0fb273570342d442314.png" rel=""><img alt="image.thumb.png.84c77b6f9837f868da70d386e005b354.png" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="2461" data-ratio="26.10" width="1000" src="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_2022_03/image.thumb.png.84c77b6f9837f868da70d386e005b354.png" /></a><br />
	<br />
	EDIT: Nevermind It appears when other things are using the pool - plex scanner is now showing up.  I guess drivepools own operations just wont/dont show activity.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">7118</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:03:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Does scanner read files in any way?</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/7105-does-scanner-read-files-in-any-way/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	trying to set up a task in windows to pause primocache to dodge some maintenance tasks that will mess up the cache and i'm wondering if scanner would be reading anything into an L2 cache or not?  If so i'll have to assign a work window for it to scan at night while primocache is paused for the other stuff as opposed to all day long. 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">7105</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 08:38:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Does scanner track drive temps in the logs?</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/6333-does-scanner-track-drive-temps-in-the-logs/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Or is there a way to check the drive temperature history in Scanner? 
</p>

<p>
	I have a new enclosure that is toasting my drives and the manufacture wants me to send them "system logs for my drives".  I sent back a clarification to see what data they need - but I'm not aware of any other "system logs" for hard drives and/or where to pull them from? I presume they're looking for historical log data on the temperatures since that's my issue.
</p>

<p>
	Any advice?
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">6333</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:16:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>S.M.A.R.T. - 78.4%</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/5930-smart-784/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	What is the significance of 78.4% in the S.M.A.R.T. details? Even the <a href="https://stablebit.com/Support/Scanner/2.X/Manual?Section=S.M.A.R.T.%20(Self-Monitoring,%20Analysis,%20and%20Reporting%20Technology)%20details" rel="external nofollow">documentation</a> has this exact value.
</p>

<p>
	I'd expect 100% if an attribute is "perfect" (on a new drive, for example) but all of my drives seem to be showing 78.4% at most.
</p>

<p>
	Thanks in advance.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">5930</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:07:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Stablebits Pool not aligned to 4k</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/4145-stablebits-pool-not-aligned-to-4k/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Hello, 
</p>

<p>
	When performing tests with as ssd I noticed that the pool shows Bad and is not aligned to 4k Is this normal? 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4145</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:52:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Source for Disk Info</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/4107-source-for-disk-info/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Good Morning - 
</p>

<p>
	I'm a long time DrivePool &amp; Scanner user and love the pair of apps which I use in my home lab.  Just wanted to ask a quick question, please.  I'm wrapping up designing a Grafana dashboard for my lab PCs which gets its data from InnoDB which in turn is populated by both telegraf and open hardware monitor. Unfortunately, I've been unable to find a good source for performance of individual disks - just basics for logical ones which obviously doesn't help with a pool.
</p>

<p>
	Just wanted to post and ask where exactly Scanner pulls its disk stats from - especially "Performance", "Drive Activity %,", &amp; "Temp".  If you can't share, I understand, but assume it's specific WMI paths.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Thanks 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4107</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:41:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>How To: Get SMART data passed on from ESXI 5.1 Host</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/131-how-to-get-smart-data-passed-on-from-esxi-51-host/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>Based on the feedback from the community, here is how to get your ESXi Host to pass on SMART data for Scanner in your guest VMs.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">All you need to do is the following and then any disk (not USB) you plugin in thereafter will be available for RDM:</p>
<ol><li>In the ESXi Console window, highlight your server</li>	<li>Go to the Configuration tab</li>	<li>Under Software, click Advanced Settings</li>	<li>Click RdmFilter</li>	<li>Uncheck the box for RdmFilter.HbaIsShared</li>	<li>Click OK</li>
</ol><p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Used the Advanced Settings for StableBit Scanner to enable "UnsafeDirectIo" to get the SMART data from the virtual controller:</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_Scanner_Advanced_Settings" rel="external nofollow">http://wiki.covecube.com/StableBit_Scanner_Advanced_Settings</a></p>
<p>And make sure that "UnsafeDirectIo" is set to "True", and reboot.</p>
<p>*Note: UnsafeDirectIo is "unsafe" for a reason. It is possible that it can cause issues or glitches, or in extremely rare conditions it can cause BSODs. In a large majority of cases, these issues don't occur, but it is a possibility. So definitely "at your own risk".</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Original Post:</p>
<p></p><hr /><p>Hi Guys,<br /><br />I have a Dell Precision T3500 Workstation, that are running VMware ESXi 5.1.0. On this host i have created 2 virtual machines, both are Windows 2012 server standard. One of these are running Stablebit Scanner v. 2.4.0.2928.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My problem is, that it does not show SMART status, temperatures or anything for any of my drives. This i all the data i get (se picture). Is there something i need to install on my ESXi host, or is this just not possible on my setup, because i use VMware?<br /><br /><img src="http://katrinegade.dk/fig1_1.png" alt="fig1_1.png" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>This i what i have on the host server:<br /><img src="http://katrinegade.dk/fig1_2.png" alt="fig1_2.png" /><br /><br /> </p>
<p>Thank you in advance..<br /> </p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">131</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 07:06:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Manually disable pool duplicaton</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/3924-manually-disable-pool-duplicaton/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	I have two identical NAS's connect via iSCSI and a separate programs will keep the two volumes in sync.  Thus I need to turn off any and all duplication process.  Is it possible?
</p>

<p>
	Thanks,
</p>

<p>
	Terry
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">3924</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 02:31:41 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Removing drive process</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/3872-removing-drive-process/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	One of my drives needs to be removed.  However, after I selected <u>Remove</u>, I see a counter making its way to 100%.  This is taking a long time for a 4TB drive.
</p>

<p>
	My question is, what exactly is DrivePool doing during the removal process?  I would like to just yank it out and be on my way but I will be patient as there has to be a reason for the countdown.
</p>

<p>
	Thanks,
</p>

<p>
	Terry
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">3872</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:51:41 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>StableBit Scanner Power Mode and Idling</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/1609-stablebit-scanner-power-mode-and-idling/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>Getting the correct power state of the disk is a little tricky. There are really 2 separate mechanisms that control whether a disk has spun down or not, the OS and the disk's firmware.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Here are the tricky parts:</p>
<ul class="bbc">
<li>The disk's firmware can spin a drive down at any time without the OS's knowledge. But this is typically disabled on new drives. This behavior can be modified under <strong>Disk Control</strong> in the StableBit Scanner.</li>
<li>In order to get the actual power state of the drive we can query it directly, instead of asking Windows. The problem here is that, to Windows, this appears as disk access and it will prevent the OS from ever spinning down the drive.</li>
</ul>
<p>What the StableBit Scanner does by default is it always asks the OS and it never queries the drive directly. This ensures that the OS will spin the drive down correctly. even though we're querying it for the power state. But the issue here is that just because the OS thinks that the drive is active doesn't mean that it's actually spun up. If the disk's firmware has spun down the drive, the OS has no way to know that. The StableBit Scanner deals with this by reporting in the UI that the drive is <strong>Standby or </strong><strong>Active</strong>. Since we can't attempt to query the drive directly without your explicit permission (this will upset Windows' power management), this is the best answer we can give you.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The <strong>Query power mode directly from disk</strong> option, which is found in <strong>Disk Settings</strong>, is there to work around this shortcoming. When enabled, the StableBit Scanner will <em>attempt</em> to query the power mode directly from the disk. Keep in mind that this can fail if it can't establish Direct I/O to the disk, in which case we fall beck to relying on the OS.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The way it works is like this:</p>
<ul class="bbc"><li>Query the OS.<ul class="bbc">
<li>If the disk has spun down then this must be the case. The disk is in <strong>Standby</strong>.</li>
<li>If the disk is Active (spun up) then we can't trust the OS because the disk firmware could have spun it down.<ul class="bbc">
<li>If the user has not explicitly allowed us to query the power mode from the disk, we must assume <strong>Standby or </strong><strong>Active</strong>.</li>
<li>If the user has allowed us to query the power mode from the disk, query the power mode.<ul class="bbc">
<li>If the query succeeds, set the mode to <strong>Active</strong> or to <strong>Standby</strong> (not both, because we know the power state for sure).</li>
<li>If the query fails, fall back to the OS and set the mode to <strong>Standby or </strong><strong>Active</strong>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li></ul>
<p>So when should you enable <strong>Query power mode directly from disk</strong>?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>When you don't want to use the OS's power management features to spin the disk down. Why would you do this?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pros:</strong></p>
<ul class="bbc">
<li>You can control the spin down on a per disk basis.</li>
<li>You get exact disk power states being reported in the StableBit Scanner with no ambiguity.</li>
<li>Avoid disk spin up issues when querying SMART (I will explain below).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons:</strong></p>
<ul class="bbc">
<li>Requires Direct I/O to the disk.</li>
<li>To the OS (and to any other program that queries the OS) the disk will appear to be always spun up.</li>
<li>When the OS spins down a disk it flushes the file system cache prior to spinning it down. This ensures that the disk is not spun up very quickly after that because it needs to write some additional data to it from the cache. When the firmware spins a disk down, this does not happen and there is a chance that the disk will be spun up very quickly after that to perform another write. From my experience, this is not common in practice.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What about S.M.A.R.T. queries?</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>In the StableBit Scanner, by default, SMART is queried from WMI first. If Direct I/O is not available then all the SMART data has to come from WMI. Typically this would not spin up a disk.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If Direct I/O is possible to the disk then at least some additional SMART data will come from Direct I/O (and if WMI doesn't have the SMART data then all of the SMART data comes from Direct I/O). One potential problem here is that Windows considers any communication with the disk, disk activity. So if you're communicating with the disk to retrieve SMART every couple of minutes then Windows will not spin the disk down.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You can avoid this problem in 2 ways:</p>
<ol>
<li>Don't let Windows control your disk spin down and set up a <strong>Standby timer</strong> in <strong>Disk Control</strong> (this has the pros and cons as outlined above).</li>	<li>Set <strong>Throttle queries</strong> in <strong>Settings</strong> -&gt; <strong>Scanner Settings </strong>-&gt; <strong>SMART</strong> -&gt; <strong>Throttle queries</strong>. Set the throttle minutes to something higher than the Windows disk spin down time (which can be examined in <strong>Power Options</strong> under the Windows Control Panel).</li>
</ol>
<p>The option <strong>Only query during the work window or if scanning</strong> controls SMART queries and has no effect on power queries. Again, by default power queries do not spin up a disk unless you've manually enabled <strong>Query power mode directly from disk</strong> (in which case you are effectively saying that you don't want the OS to ever spin down a disk).</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1609</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:23:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>StableBit Scanner Known Issues and Limitations</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/1207-stablebit-scanner-known-issues-and-limitations/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Due to how StableBit Scanner current works, there are some known limitations.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Stable Release: 2.5.1.3062
</p>

<p>
	Public Beta Release: 2.5.2.3146
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<strong>SMART data from RAID Arrays</strong>. Because most controllers hide the contents of the RAID array, we're not able to access information about them from inside the OS. There are ways to access the data about the drives, but this usually requires implementing 3rd party code, or by accessing data through the controller's management software (such as HighPoint's Web Management software). <br>
		We are looking into implementing this feature in the future, but there is no ETA.
	</li>
	<li>
		<b>SMART Data from Storage Spaces array.</b> Because of the low level implementation of Storage Spaces, the disks in the array are hidden from access normally.  This makes getting information about the disk (including SMART data) significantly more difficult. <br>
		We are looking into implementing this feature in the future, but there is no ETA.
	</li>
	<li>
		<b>Repairing Damaged Sectors.</b> Right now, we only identify and flag damage (unreadable) sectors on disks. Repair is up to the disk or the user to manually repair these issues. 
	</li>
	<li>
		<b>Temperature or Max Temperature shows a 0C, </b><strong>Disk capacity is mis-reported, or  Drive Reports significantly number of unreadable sectors (Especially newer USB drives) </strong>This is a known issue with the way that the drive is reporting disk information, up to and including sector sizes.  This has been resolved in the latest internal beta build (2.5.2.3121).
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Dynamic Disks are not reported properly.</strong> Due to the added complexity of how dynamic disk operate, they were not being shown properly in the disk lists. This has been resolved in the latest public beta build (2.5.2.3100)
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Disk List issues with a lot of disks. </strong>Fixed in internal beta build (2.5.2.3107 and up)
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Pushover notifications fail. </strong>This is due to an API change.  Fixed in latest internal betas (2.5.2.3122)
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>File system repair fails </strong>This is a known issue, and has been fixed in the Public beta (2.5.2.3103)
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>File system comes back as unhealthy, consistently. </strong>
		<ul>
			<li>
				?If you are running Windows 8 or up, this may be an issue with the command  you use. Please run "chkdsk x: /f" to verify. Adding the "/scan" command actually misses a number of issues as it skips a number of checks. The main one is MFT corruption.   <br>
				Stablebit Scanner is not misreporting info, but CHKDSK isn't checking everything. 
			</li>
			<li>
				If there is no corruption (verified by CHKDSK) and you're seeing this come back constantly (and it disappears on a recheck), there is a known issue where the data comes back incorrectly.  It's on the "to do list" to fix.
			</li>
		</ul>
	</li>
	<li>
		<b>Disk list is empty over Remote Desktop Connection.</b> This is an issue with the 3rd party controls that we use for StableBit Scanner.  This is been fixed in the Public Beta version (2.5.2.3103).
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Non-NTFS file system (ReFS) Support.</strong> This is a newer file system, and not currently supported.  While surface scans will occur, we have no way to identify files or recover them.  This means that we need to reverse engineer the file system and build a custom ReFS parser (much like we did for NTFS).  The same would need to be done for exFAT and other file systems. However, we will probably only target NTFS and ReFS, as these are the primary file systems in use.
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>No WSSX (Windows Server Essentials) installer exists.</strong> Starting with 2.5.2.3132, we have stopped producing the WSSX (WHS/WSE) installer.  Now, the EXE installer will install both the stand alone UI and the dashboard tab, so the EXE should be used for all installations.  
		<ul>
			<li>
				This allows for more unified changes, and installation.  And it allows for both the dashboard and stand alone UI to be used. 
			</li>
		</ul>
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	This list is by no means comprehensive, and it's contents may change as these issues are investigated. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div>
	Internal Beta builds can be found here:
</div>

<div>
	 
</div>

<div>
	The latest, safe build is 2.5.2.3146
</div>

<div>
	General Windows:
</div>

<div>
	<a data-ipb="nomediaparse" href="http://dl.covecube.com/ScannerWindows/beta/download/?C=N;O=D" rel="external nofollow">http://dl.covecube.com/ScannerWindows/beta/download/?C=N;O=D</a>
</div>

<div>
	 
</div>

<div>
	Don't download the latest build unless it's been checked out or you've been instructed to. 
</div>

<div>
	If it's not a build numbered in the change log, then it's an interim development build and may not be stable. 
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1207</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 23:35:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>How To: Getting SMART data from Hyper-V</title><link>https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/29-how-to-getting-smart-data-from-hyper-v/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry if the title may be misleading.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the Hyper-V disk passthrough driver does not pass along SMART data from the "host" drive to the VM. That means that there is no way to get Scanner to display this data in the Virtual Machines.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>However, you can run two copies:</p>
<p>One on the Host, and one in the Virtual Machine. (yes, not ideal, but you do get a discount on the price)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On the Host version, disable the disk scans.</p>
<p>To do this, right click on one of the disks that are going to be (or already are) passed through. Then click on the "Disk Settings" option.</p>
<p>On this window, check the "never scan surface automatically" and "never scan file system automatically".</p>
<p>  </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_09_2013/post-6-0-12364600-1378515649.png" data-fileid="84" rel=""><img src="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_09_2013/post-6-0-12364600-1378515649_thumb.png" data-fileid="84" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="post-6-0-12364600-1378515649_thumb.png"></a></div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Once that's done, you don't need to do anything on the Guest VMs, as they just won't get SMART data.</p>
<p>I'd recommend setting up email notifications so that you know when you're getting SMART errors.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Original Post</p>
<p></p><hr><p> </p>
<p>Hi there,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I just downloaded Scanner for my virtualized WHS 2011 setup, which runs within Hyper-V Server 2012.  Each of my data drives are passed through to WHS.  However, Scanner says it can't read SMART data from any of the drives.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My understanding was that Hyper-V did pass through SMART data to the guest OS.  Is there some trick to enabling this?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_09_2013/post-6-0-12364600-1378515649.png" data-fileid="84" rel=""><img src="https://community.covecube.com/uploads/monthly_09_2013/post-6-0-12364600-1378515649_thumb.png" data-fileid="84" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="post-6-0-12364600-1378515649_thumb.png"></a></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">29</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 00:47:29 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
