I'll be the first to admit, this is relatively new ground for me. That being said, its evident SMART is a standard and so you'd think most things would be uniform regardless of medium/platform.
if i use snapraid and/or smartctl to run my smart data it comes up with one of my drives at 100% chance of failure within the next year. It has 43 unrecoverable errors. The SMART wiki itself indicates unrecoverable errors as being one of the several "critical" attributes. A quick google and the consensus is "id replace a disk with errors ASAP"
i decided to check scanner as i'd received no warnings or anything of the nature. Meanwhile scanner sees the 43 errors but apparently determines that as being just fine.
Question
klepp0906
I'll be the first to admit, this is relatively new ground for me. That being said, its evident SMART is a standard and so you'd think most things would be uniform regardless of medium/platform.
if i use snapraid and/or smartctl to run my smart data it comes up with one of my drives at 100% chance of failure within the next year. It has 43 unrecoverable errors. The SMART wiki itself indicates unrecoverable errors as being one of the several "critical" attributes. A quick google and the consensus is "id replace a disk with errors ASAP"
i decided to check scanner as i'd received no warnings or anything of the nature. Meanwhile scanner sees the 43 errors but apparently determines that as being just fine.
which is right?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.