Hey I was wondering if this would be a good idea and/if it would work?
Two Google Drive Accounts
One 16TB Cloud Drive on Account One and another 16TB Cloud Drive on Account Two
Pool them together through DrivePool = 32 TB Shared Data
Would this result in the following?
Saving/uploading a file to this Aggregate Cloud Drive Pool would use the software's Drive Balancing to Distribute files in their entirety (Video File 1 - with it's various chunks on Drive One --- Video File 2 - with it's various chunks on Drive Two) or would it upload 50% of the chunks from Video file 1 to Drive 1 and the other 50% to Drive 2?
My Goal is to have a distributed Cloud DrivePool not simply for increased storage, but the effective doubling of my Upload Cap for the day 1,500 GB Daily vs 750, along with doubling my API calls/reliability?
Would this be a good option?
That way if there's a file playing from Drive A, and another from Drive B simultaneously I can avoid throttling by not having so many download requests in a short time?
Reason being that if I have 10 Download threads enable (to avoid DDOS protection) and I use two separate drives (or more likely 1 drive and multiple file/chunk-group request) on the same provider, would it be slower or more straining on the download requests?
My idea sounds great in theory, but I wanted confirmation to see if the software would work this way?
Question
Bowsa
Hey I was wondering if this would be a good idea and/if it would work?
Would this result in the following?
Saving/uploading a file to this Aggregate Cloud Drive Pool would use the software's Drive Balancing to Distribute files in their entirety (Video File 1 - with it's various chunks on Drive One --- Video File 2 - with it's various chunks on Drive Two) or would it upload 50% of the chunks from Video file 1 to Drive 1 and the other 50% to Drive 2?
My Goal is to have a distributed Cloud DrivePool not simply for increased storage, but the effective doubling of my Upload Cap for the day 1,500 GB Daily vs 750, along with doubling my API calls/reliability?
Would this be a good option?
That way if there's a file playing from Drive A, and another from Drive B simultaneously I can avoid throttling by not having so many download requests in a short time?
Reason being that if I have 10 Download threads enable (to avoid DDOS protection) and I use two separate drives (or more likely 1 drive and multiple file/chunk-group request) on the same provider, would it be slower or more straining on the download requests?
My idea sounds great in theory, but I wanted confirmation to see if the software would work this way?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
9 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.