arizzi Posted April 14 Posted April 14 Hello! I've written a program that does checksums for my files on a stablebit drive pool. It uses the NTFS id for the file as an identifier. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/fileapi/ns-fileapi-by_handle_file_information?redirectedfrom=MSDN I notice across scans that the ntfs id for the file is changed, even if no changes were made to the file (file was not replaced either). Is this expected behavior? My workaround is just to scan the drives directly rather than the pool. Quote
0 Shane Posted April 14 Posted April 14 Hi arizzi, please see this thread: https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/12577-beware-of-drivepool-corruption-data-leakage-file-deletion-performance-degradation-scenarios-windows-1011/ TLDR, DrivePool's implementation of FileID is persistent across neither reboots nor moves, and increments from zero on the former so collisions are inevitable. Furthermore, for potential problems with checksums if read striping is not disabled on a duplicated pool see this thread: https://community.covecube.com/index.php?/topic/5414-pool-file-duplication-causing-file-corruption-under-certain-circumstances/ TLDR, to avoid potential checksum/data corruption you should disable Read Striping on any pool that uses duplication. There is no ETA on a fix. Quote
Question
arizzi
Hello! I've written a program that does checksums for my files on a stablebit drive pool. It uses the NTFS id for the file as an identifier. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/fileapi/ns-fileapi-by_handle_file_information?redirectedfrom=MSDN
I notice across scans that the ntfs id for the file is changed, even if no changes were made to the file (file was not replaced either). Is this expected behavior?
My workaround is just to scan the drives directly rather than the pool.
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.