Grant Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 I have a Mushkin Enhanced ECO2 (Model MKNSSDEC240GB) SSD. Brand new, has been powered on for 3 hours. Stablebit scanner giving me warnings for Soft Read Error Rate. But I don't think that the SMART data is being interpreted correctly. Several forum posts I found seem to confirm that this is not a sign the drive is failing, just normal values for this model. Using CrystalDiskInfo, I see that attributes 01 (Raw Read Error Rate), C3 (On-the-fly ECC Uncorrectable Error Count), C9 (Uncorrectable Soft Read Error Rate) and CC (Soft ECC Correction Rate) all show the same value, which keeps increasing every time I refresh. Tried with 2.5.1.3062 and beta 2.5.2.3103, get the same results. It says that it is using non-manufacturer specific interpretation rules. I have submitted it to Bitflock - ID 67QSGP8S Some other forums say that it is just misinterpreting the data from this particular SSD (because everyone decided to use different attributes and values for their SSDs. Just to make life more interesting). See the posts by MushkinSean at these links: http://poweredbymushkin.com/index.php/forum/mushkin-solid-state-drives/86-s-m-a-r-t-attribute-201.html http://poweredbymushkin.com/index.php/forum/mushkin-solid-state-drives/1073-mushkin-enhanced-chronos-mknssdcr120gb-2-5-120gb.html I'm guessing you guys just need to figure out the right way to interpret the data from this particular SSD? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher (Drashna) Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 If the drive is using the "non-manufacturer specific interpretation rules", then yes, more than likely it's an issue with parsing the information properly. SSDs are very bad about using proprietary interpretations or non-standard reporting. That's why we have rules in the first place. Thank you for grabbing the BitFlock ID already. I've flagged this for Alex (the developer) so he can take a look at it, and fix this. https://stablebit.com/Admin/IssueAnalysis/26053 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher (Drashna) Posted December 28, 2016 Share Posted December 28, 2016 Sorry for the delay on this. I believe that Alex has updated the definitions, so it should be detected properly (as a SandForce controller). It should be updated automatically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.