Jump to content

superka

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by superka

  1. On 10/10/2020 at 6:34 PM, srcrist said:

    I don't have any info on this other than to say that I am not experiencing these issues, and that I haven't experienced any blue screens related to those settings. That user isn't suggesting a rollback, they're suggesting that you edit the advanced settings to force your drive to convert to the newer hierarchical format.

    I should also note that I do not work for Covecube--so aside from a lot of technical experience with the product, I'm probably not the person to consult about new issues. I think we might need to wait on Christopher here. My understanding, though, was that those errors were fixed with release .1314. It presumes that existing data is fine as-is, and begins using a hierarchical structure for any NEW data that you add to the drive. That should solve the problem. So make sure that you're on .1314 or later for sure.

    Relevant changelog:

    
    .1314
    * [Issue #28415] Created a new chunk organization for Google Drive called Hierarchical Pure.
        - All new drives will be Hierarchical Pure.
        - Flat upgraded drives will be Hierarchical, which is now a hybrid Flat / Hierarchical mode.
        - Upgrading from Flat -> Hierarchical is very fast and involves no file moves.
    * Tweaked Web UI object synchronization throttling rules.
    .1312
    * Added the drive status bar to the Web UI.
    .1310
    * Tuned statistics reporting intervals to enable additional statistics in the StableBit Cloud.
    .1307
    * Added detailed logging to the Google Drive migration process that is enabled by default.
    * Redesigned the Google Drive migration process to be quicker in most cases:
        - For drives that have not run into the 500,000 files per folder limit, the upgrade will be nearly instantaneous.
        - Is able to resume from where the old migration left off.

     

    Ok, upgraded to las beta version crossing my fingers and everythig is working fine, no more errors. Thanks.

  2. 4 hours ago, JoeyD said:

    Managed to fix this today as my client was giving errors also. 

    Install Beta version from here: http://dl.covecube.com/CloudDriveWindows/beta/download/ (I used 1344)

    Reboot.

    Don't start CloudDrive and/or service.

    Add the below to this file: C:\ProgramData\StableBit CloudDrive\Service\Settings.json

       "GoogleDrive_ForceUpgradeChunkOrganization": {
        "Default": true,
        "Override": true
      } 

    Start Service & CloudDrive. Should kick in straight away. I have 42TB in GDrive and it went through immediately. Back to uploading as usual now. 

    Hope this helps. 

    I'm afraid of doing this.

     

    Last time i did a rollback my computer entered in a bluescreen reboot mode all the time.

    @srcrist can we have some info about this? i'm afraid

  3. On 6/29/2018 at 10:12 PM, Christopher (Drashna) said:

    Drop the number of threads to 10 each, increase the minimum download size to 10+ MB, and drop the prefetch time window to 30-60 seconds. 

    That should help. 

     

    really thanks, now its working at more than 300mbps+

     

    btw, what about upload threshold ? do i need to leve it at 1,00mb ?

     

    Thanks.

  4.  

    Pro has much higher endurance, and would be the recommended one for higher usage.  Samsung SSD/NVMe Pro editions are top shelf.

    But don't you already have a 950 Pro that's getting bottlenecked?  Or is the 970 you are considering purchasing a NVMe?

    This site can be helpful when comparing NVMe's and SSDs for speed and pricing.

    850 pro (the sata one)

     

    I've got 2 M.2 sockets, one runing pci 3.0 x4 and other one runing pci 2.0 x4.

  5.  

    Then it sounds like the two issues that you're having is capacity, and IOPS.   A good SSD (and better, an NVMe drive) will fix the second issue.  But the capacity issue is something I can't really help with. But this also sounds like a case of "throw more money at the problem". 

    Samgun 970 Evo 500gb sounds good? or best to go with pro version?

  6.  

    I think you are in a unique situation and no one else has the problem.  :huh:

    Usually a network connection isn't going to outpace a SSD, and if it does there are other options to fall back on.  I use a 20GB L1 RAM cache in my system to avoid bottle-necking my drives (even a Samsung 850 Pro) and speed up all disk operations, out of 64GB total RAM.  In your case, if you have (or can install) 64GB or 128GB of memory and dedicate ~80% of that to a L1 RAM cache, you might avoid most of the issues you are seeing.  A RAM cache will go a long way to help eliminate unnecessary writes (live trimming), redundant reads, reads against written data, etc.

    You might also consider limiting up/down transfer speeds with Clouddrive's bandwidth limiter in the meantime, so you don't choke the drive(s) with 100% activity.

    64GB of ram nowdays its really expensive for me , this would be the best option but is out of my budget.

     

    I can also limit the up and down transfers... but its sad to do this when a software implementation can help the transfers.

     

    What about who own a 1gbit simetric network? the problem will persist.

  7.  

    Well, a 64GB or 128GB RAM cache would probably solve the bottleneck issue.  But that's a bunch of money into RAM, and the motherboard to support it.

     

    I think he means the ability to set the cache folder separately for reads and writes.  i.e. all reads would be cached on drive X, all writes would be cached on drive Y.  He's trying to increase throughput at the drive level since it's his current bottleneck for transfers.  Apparently the SSD just can't keep up with up/down at the same time.   :wacko:

    exactly.

     

    2bb505906073e1dc66aaea7c2e61e4ca.png

     

     

     

    485b6bb43417e59f757ec026fbfb8d6e.png

  8.  

    How large are the files you are talking about?  Small enough to fit (mostly) in memory temporarily?  If so a RAM cache might help your downloading/uploading.  I use a 20GB L1 cache (using 3rd party software) with a variable write time delay, to help avoid bottlenecks like that.

    The notion of specifying up/down caches for Clouddrive is interesting (I do like the idea), just not sure they could expose & split that feature between two separate physical drives.

    Or...  perhaps it's time for a NVMe?   You could even use the NVMe drive as a L2 cache in front of your Samsung SSD, to speed up all read/write ops and even reduce writes with built-in trimming.

    P.S.  I'm officially jealous of your transfer speeds!    :P   Still stuck on conventional 400/20 cable broadband here.  Fiber has been "coming" for a decade now, still not in sight!

     

     

    i do have an NVMe as primary disk, im using the samsung 950 pro as only cache,

     

    In 2 months i have over 10tb's of data writen (i lots of gb's of video 4k)

     

    Mechanical disk is not fast enought to use all my bandwitch with data upload verification activated(and this is important for me)

     

    Nope i don't mean this.

     

    Everytime i copy something to my gdrive it just copies to the SSD, then it upload to the cloud. At the same time it beging to download in the same disk (to do the verification)

     

    If some1 else of my network start to streaming the video, it just buffers and transfers speed to cloud decrease.

     

    Thats why if we could use one hardrive to upload and another to download would be wonderful.

  9. Hi everybody!

     

    I've been using this fantastic software for 3 months ago and i really love it.

     

    the only thing I miss is being able to configure the download cache different from the upload

    Why?

    With ftth 600/600 even the SSD Samsung pro 950 gets bottleneck if i copy big size files and the software is downloading and uploading at same time (upload verification)

     

    It would be wonderful if you could use a mechanical hard drive for uploads and a solid hard drive for downloads. (also longer life for the SSD).

     

    What do you think?

     

    Javi,

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...