Wearyeyed
-
Posts
3 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Wearyeyed
-
-
And being a noob here, I put this in the wrong forum. If a mod could correct, I'd be slightly less embarrassed....
-
Okay, so I have used and loved DP and Scanner for as long as WHSv1 existed, and I continue to use them on my Server 2012 r2 machine.
It acts as a file server, "my documents" location, and machine back-ups location for our client machines in the house, making client restores\rebuilds super-easy, and accessing all of our "common files" a breeze across machines.
I use Crash Plan and love the way they all play together, both in theory and in practice - oh, yes, I have made more than my fair-share of "recovery scenarios" come to life over the years.
But, I am boring in my execution...I have 4 drives, and they are duplicated x4, so I essentially end-up with some semblance of a 4-drive RAID 0 configuration.
Mainly so if I die in a fiery car wreck, wifey can trip over the drive cage, take any random drive that falls out and have a friend set-it up on her local machine and life goes on without my techy-overhead.
Here's the situation and question: In the event of a single drive failure, the pool goes into read-only.
It *seems* like to get anything up and running quickly for normal use (say, for example, a Quicken file to which I will need to write) until a replacement drive is available, I would need to:
- Turn duplication back to 3 (instead of 4)
- Remove the bad drive
Otherwise, DP get's busy trying to make the 4th copy across the remaining three drives, and creates a balancing mess that later causes a bunch of overhead.
Am I doing (or thinking about) this wrong?
Is there a better way?
Pretty-boring Usage Question
in General
Posted
Thank you for that, Drashna!
I love tinkering with these two products and have for a long time in many different configurations and for many different needs, as my household grew.
Maybe I needed to start a post just to tell you that.
You and Alex keep up the good work!