Jump to content

Spider99

Members
  • Posts

    544
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Posts posted by Spider99

  1. Have searched for similar problems but it appears that most of the solutions revolve around update to a new beta - but i am on the latest 740 beta

     

    I have two pools on the same 2012r2 server - one balances fine the other will not

     

    I have the same settings on both - only SSD optimiser and scanner plugins active

     

    the non balancing pool shows it not 100% balanced via bar at bottom 

     

    manual re balance - thinks about it for a few seconds but does not move any files

     

    set it to balance immediately with no time limit - no files moved

     

    set it to maintain 100% balanced - no files moved

     

    The main drive graphic shows that files should be moved (blue triangles)

     

     

     

    Its causing backups to fail as when A_SSD files up the backup fails with "..not enough space..." - happened two nights in a row now

     

    There is a difference between the pools in that the non balancing one is only partly duplicated - the other is fully duplicated

     

    The backup should be duplicated on the non working pool - hence why B_SSD is light blue

     

    Chris - Options??

  2. Ok it was not clear which drive was which

     

    ok fine we will see if you are correct in a years time if mine fail

     

    Ha old school :)

     

    You can save a lot of space and have a better experience if you do rip and / or remux the video files - just ripped two Blu-rays (LOTR - extended edition 30GB for each file same movie split over two disks - joined together - remux'd to h265 file size went from 60GB to 12GB :) no loss of quality and plays fine. 

     

    Have fun

  3. lol you add extra info and explanation only after i point out what you could do 

     

    i have three of those archive drives and you can use them as normal drives just dont expect the speeds of a full fat 8TB drive - they have can be written to like any other drive

     

    Setting up a duplication between pools is easy with something like syncbackse/pro and as you say is not a feature of DP itself

     

    You would use you first pool with kodi as thats where your movies are??? or are you still ripping your dvd' and blu-rays to iso and storing them that way and/or accessing them that way with Kodi?

     

    Yes the error reporting leaves a lot missing and why data x is being moved to drive y

     

    Those screen shots show disk2 data being moved to disk 3 - i think you said disk2 is an archive drive?

  4. I would prefere to keep everything in one pool. - OK

     

    As I see it, if I make a second pool and the Archive drives are full, I'm not guaranteed that new movies are duplicated. Why would they not be duplicated? - settings are by the pool - so put the two archives drives in a separate pool and turn on duplication sorted? Or keep one pool with duplication?

     

    The way it's intended to work now, the latest iso's are stored on the NAS drives if the Archive drives are full. The reason why I want to separate the iso's from the rest of the files is that the iso's are not likely to be changed in any way opposed to txt and jpg files. Sorry dont see how that affects anything other than drive running time

     

    I'm using my Movie folder as a Source for Kodi and must keep Library files in the same folder. - Kodi only see's the pool drive which presents the files as windows would - it cant see the poolpart directories across all the disks. For example Plex and Emby have no problem with this and neither should Kodi - if you have had problems in the past then that was for other reasons

     

    As for the new error - not seen that before - Chris might have a clue when he gets to this thread

     

    Have fun

  5. Win pro just runs headless - just need to ensure RDP is enabled IIRC its off by default - other than that you are good to go out the box

     

     

    You must be one of the few people in the world happy to watch 480p :):P

     

    with 30-45% cpu Plex was transcoding that movie - if it was direct streaming then it would be similar to a file copy probably less than 5% - its the client software/device that determines if transcoding is needed or not

     

    Good Luck with getting some sleep

  6. Ok my directions wont help if you cant get to the m/b bios

     

    One thing to check in the m/b bios is the boot order - it could be the lsi is trying to boot and as there is not bootable disk you get dead lock

     

    I suspect you can fix the boot order as the card will not be loaded when you are in the bios

  7. Is it a new card or a used one

     

    If used it may well have some firmware setup still in the bios of the card

     

    If you search on flashing the card (most LSI are flashable) you could reset it and that may help get you to boot

     

    If you have a new ish m/b then it should be UEFI capable so you can boot to that - flash the card and reboot and hopefully the pc will boot

     

    If its new you might have a faulty card - do you have another pc to try it in?

     

    I have flashed my 9211 recently so have the steps to flash it - but it might be different for the 9207 (i guess it will be similar)

  8. Yep it should work fine as you describe

     

    Only thing that will not work that well is the Plex server for any transcoding thats needed - you dont mention you clients to play any media as they dictate what does and does not need transcoding

     

    You can overcome this by making sure your media is in a format that the clients can play natively so your server streams the media directly

     

    If it were mine i would increase the Ram to give windows and plex room to breath say 8gb or 16gb but you could do that after you have it running to see if it needs it and its a cheap upgrade :)

     

    Have fun

  9. can you format it on the host machine directly to 7.28TB as a single partition?

     

    It will need to be GPT to get more than 2.2TB

     

    is it connected to a different sata controller?

     

    is the controller set to AHCI?

     

    Win 7 32 bit only supports 2TB but Win 7 64 supports GPT so thats not your issue - so something is not getting passed through correctly

     

    Have you tried the vmware forums?

  10. Well i created a new pool on a different machine (win 10 vs win 2012r2) and the UNusable is back

     

    After a lot of checking and messing around as nothing would clear it - no other data on the pool drives - no SVI and no Recycle bin - remeasure does not change the values - copying extra data to pool does not change the values

     

    Turning on duplication (other pool does not have this on) changes the value - tends to wander about - and finally settles on a new value

     

    I removed each disk in turn and deleted the volume and then recreated it and re added it to the pool

     

    The unusable returned until i had done each disk in turn - nothing special or different about the last disk

     

    I am very suspicious this is a bug in 740 as prior to changing to this version not seen this error

     

    Ha scratch that Unusable is back again!

     

    There are only two directories on the drives - recycle bin and poolpart 

     

    Any explanation for the wired numbers????

     

     

     

     

     

     

  11. As i understand it when the SSd cache becomes full it should fall back to the Archive drives

     

    But

     

    If you are copying large volumes of data (internally within the server in this case) it will fail 50% of the time

     

    Basically what appears to be happening is

     

    If the ssd's are beyond their limit % full setting the next file will fall back to the archive drives - as expected - (in my case 95% full)

     

    However if the ssd's are not at or near the % full setting and the next file exceeds the remaining space on the ssd's (large video files) then the copy fails with a STREAM(????) error - not good for unattended large copies  :P

     

    If you get the pool to balance and create sufficient space the copy will proceed - however this "paused" copy has an unwanted side effect as it generates a large amount of "Unusable for duplication" data in my case over 700GB worth - checking the disks sizes and comparing file size totals - with checking for hidden files and running a full chkdsk /f on all drives did not show any errors or orphaned files - its appears to be a bug in the calc by DP - as copying more data to the pool reduces the "Unusable for duplication" by the amount copied :blink:. In my case there are no other files on these disks only the pool part dir, recycle bin and SVI - both SVI and recycle bin are turned off and empty as they were the first things i checked.

     

    Have a suspicion that the amount of "Unusable for duplication" is the size of the copy which "fails" and if you have more than one it is cumulative - difficult to check as it depends what files are copied and their sizes to induce the error.

     

    I did reboot to see if it would solve the issue - no joy

    I remeasured the pool a couple of times - no joy

     

    i just copied 203GB of data to the pool and the  "Unusable for duplication" dropped from 502GB to 299GB - as each file was copied the total dropped by that amount during the copy.

    Doing a second copy of 296GB to see if i end up with ~ 3GB left in "Unusable for duplication" - total is dropping by file copied as seen in first copy. [edit] - ended up with 3.34GB unusable left after copy. Now it is back to normal as have copied more data across to the pool and do not have Unusable anymore.

     

    DP version 740 Beta

    Win 2012r2 SE

    Pool in question is not duplicated

    Pool is second pool on server - if that makes any difference

     

    If you need any logs etc let me know :)

  12. lol - yes have three of the 950 Pro's

     

    doubt you need to raid 0 them as you are unlikely to have anything that will stress them :)

     

    Make sure you get Samsung Magician and the Samsung NVME drivers as Windows 10 only has a basic driver

     

    IIRC scanner might have issues with getting the SMART info off the drives - but it will get fixed im sure

     

    Make sure the NVME drives are very well cooled as the run very hot 60-80c in operation and can easily overheat - then they throttle their speed 

     

    Enjoy

  13. Hi

     

    Couple of things to check

     

    Does the LSI card provide Sata @ 3g or 6g and does the Intel expander provide 3g or 6g for sata also - IIRC as i looked at those cards along with others i think they "only" give 3g Sata - if you are using DP then it wont be an issue as you are not going to max it out anyway. This is moot if you are using SAS drives.

     

    Cheaper alternatives for the LSI - look for 9211-8i ~$60 and the HP Expander will do 24 drives for approx ~$30 on second hand market (have two :))

     

    Another thing to check is the power per rail that the PSU provides - depending on the number of drives you will be running check the amount of power that can be provided to the HDD - some cheaper lines of PSU are geared to providing most of the power to the GPU(s) and M/B and the HDD get whats left

     

    I have a MX300 (750gb) and they are ok had no issues but the Samsung 850 Pro are a bit faster and you get a better warranty - so you get what you pay for :)

     

    Dont forget your CPU cooler - i would look at the AIO water cooling units from Coolermaster - although you might have a challenge mounting the radiator with in the Norco case - possibly on the new fan wall?

     

    Have fun

×
×
  • Create New...